IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,9/10
2773
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Dorothy Otnow Lewis
- Self - Clinical Psychiatrist
- (as Dorothy Lewis)
Catherine Yeager
- Self - Clinical Psychologist
- (as Dr. Catherine Yeager)
Park Dietz
- Self - Forensic Psychiatrist
- (as Dr. Park Dietz)
Tom Brokaw
- Self - Host, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Bill Clinton
- Self - Governor of Arkansas
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Thomas Coccuzzi
- Self - Defense Attorney for Arthur Shawcross
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Laura Dern
- Self - Literary Voice of Dorothy Lewis
- (Synchronisation)
Walt Disney
- Self - Animator
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- …
William Elledge
- Self - Convicted Murderer
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Henry Ford
- Self - Industrialist & Antisemite
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph Paul Franklin
- Self - Convicted Murderer & Neo-Nazi Terrorist
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Alex Gibney
- Self - Filmmaker
- (Synchronisation)
Charles Gibson
- Self - ABC News Anchor
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self - Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 - 1945
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Hermann Göring
- Self - President of the Reichstag, 1932 - 1945
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Führer and Chancellor of Germany
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph P. Kennedy
- Self - Kennedy Family Patriarch & Antisemite
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The topic is quite interesting, but about halfway through, I felt like it was getting repetitive. The same thing was being said in interview, just slightly different wording.
It's easy to start falling down the rabbit hole of whatever your life work is. I think Dorothy bridged some huge gaps in mental health and how that affects some people. Like the film said, killers are made, not born. However, to be in favor of halting death penalty cases so one can be researched (or do the researching) is very wrong. I feel this film focused on the humanity of the killer and ignored the victims. That's fine if you're doing research to understand the mind of a killer, but to want to take on the ethics of capital punishment goes too far. MANY people have really messed up childhoods and anyone reading this has experienced that or knows someone who did. They don't all start killing (and that's addressed in this film). But the death penalty isn't only about ridding humanity of a threat or to even be a deterrent for others. It's about getting justice for the victim(s) and the family(s) of the victim(s). It would be nice if life was free of horrible, terrible things like rape, murder, torture etc. Unfortunately, that's just a part of human nature that will never go away. Doing research and attempting to understand all facets of the human brain is fantastic - the more we know the better. However, the death penalty should be in place in EVERY STATE and used only for the worst of society who's crimes have been proved 100% - there's ZERO chance that a mistake has been made. Society needs that. To know that there is a punishment to fit the crime.
Super interesting topic. Not saying her work isn't valid, but how it's presented is one-sided. Knowing it is a highly divisive area of psychology, no scrutinizing opposing views are explored. It's difficult to take the content as unbiased - even if they're on to something. I didn't get anything out of it. The doctor seems like a sweet lady and I do appreciate her humanitarian approach.
Dr. Lewis likely has interviewed more serial killers than anyone else on the planet, but it is doubtful whether all that talk has produced any useful research on the subject. Her seeming determination to discover multiple personalities in every serial killer she interviews damages her credibility and exposes her stunning gullibility.
On the subject dissosiative personality disorder, or the scapegoat to every ''eye for an eye''-fanaticand criminal court systen back in the medeval ages of 1980's and 1990's usa. beloved and hatred for her simple claim that noone is born evil, and that there are always an environmental or medical disorder behind every crime, the worse a crime, the more damaged the perputrator are.having an ethical code that says if your insane you cannot be punished to death by excecution, and that is a roaring cry that should be heard among the medical and justice superiors in every criminal court anywhere.
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is a highly controversial diagnosis, with many arguments against it being anything more than an iatrogenic disorder -- in other words, caused by the therapy/therapist itself. Most notable amongst these arguments is that unlike other psychological disorders, DID is not observed outside of treatment with certain select clinicians, all of whom already believe in DID. What has been observed across all clinicians and researchers, however, are examples of confirmation bias, persuasive interview techniques, demand characteristics, and the oftentimes overwhelming urge to please demonstrated by patients in general. In addition, early North American works (DID is an overwhelmingly American disorder, yet another point of contention for the pro/anti-DID debate) which are seen as having started the DID diagnosis trend have been debunked in recent years as primarily fictitious stories, written to sell books. As controversial as the diagnosis of DID is, many feel that there may be some degree of negligence on the part of the producer(s), the director, and the film company as a whole for not employing a disclaimer as well as affording equal time to opposing expert viewpoints.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 777: Mank + The Queen's Gambit (2020)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Crazy, Not Insane?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 59 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 16:9 HD
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Crazy, Not Insane (2020) officially released in India in English?
Antwort