jasonplynch
mar 2021 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas5
Clasificación de jasonplynch
Amy was funny for a minute 20 years ago. Sadly, she never further developed her craft. Same old predictable trash. This movie was difficult to watch for the most part. It had an interesting premise, but Amy just wasn't right for this role. There were a few funny moments in the movie, but most of them came from her co-stars, and were more crass than well written.
To put it another way, I saw this movie on Netflix for free, and despite that, I feel as though I should be compensated financially. With all of her money from bad movies, could she not at least afford a gym membership or trainer? She looks like she is storing a cupcake in each cheek like some sort of diabetic chipmunk.
To put it another way, I saw this movie on Netflix for free, and despite that, I feel as though I should be compensated financially. With all of her money from bad movies, could she not at least afford a gym membership or trainer? She looks like she is storing a cupcake in each cheek like some sort of diabetic chipmunk.
Let's take a minute and be objective and honest about this movie. This is absolutely not "one of Spike Lee's best films" despite what critics say. I feel like mainstream critics feel obligated to praise this movie out of guilt and virtue signaling.
The premise for this movie is interesting, but the entire movie was very poorly directed and insists upon itself and rests upon the laurels of Spike's past work and BLM support.
An example of the lazy writing and directing is the flashback scenes. Why do the actors have grey hair when they would have been 20 years old in the flashback scene?
Another example: why was it never explained why 5 enlisted black soldiers were running all over Vietnam together and being sent on a recovery mission? This would have been highly unlikely, especially since they were with the 1st Infantry Division, which is a conventional unit. A mission of this nature would fall far out of their purview.
In short, this film appears to have been written and directed by a complete amateur.
The premise for this movie is interesting, but the entire movie was very poorly directed and insists upon itself and rests upon the laurels of Spike's past work and BLM support.
An example of the lazy writing and directing is the flashback scenes. Why do the actors have grey hair when they would have been 20 years old in the flashback scene?
Another example: why was it never explained why 5 enlisted black soldiers were running all over Vietnam together and being sent on a recovery mission? This would have been highly unlikely, especially since they were with the 1st Infantry Division, which is a conventional unit. A mission of this nature would fall far out of their purview.
In short, this film appears to have been written and directed by a complete amateur.
I've always been a huge fan of Katt's work, but this performance was not good. In the past, his "pimp" persona added humor to his delivery. In this special, he removed that persona and replaced it with a goofy voice and awkward mannerism. I found his new delivery more annoying than funny. There were a few funny moments in his act, but overall it lacked creativity and originality and replaced them with raunchy and effortless cliches. The overall feel of this special is that he put it together without any heart just to fulfill a contractual obligation.