ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,2/10
121 k
MA NOTE
Un spécialiste de la protection des témoins se méfie de ses collègues alors qu'il traite une affaire impliquant des armes de haute technologie.Un spécialiste de la protection des témoins se méfie de ses collègues alors qu'il traite une affaire impliquant des armes de haute technologie.Un spécialiste de la protection des témoins se méfie de ses collègues alors qu'il traite une affaire impliquant des armes de haute technologie.
- Nommé pour 1 oscar
- 3 victoires et 2 nominations au total
Commentaire en vedette
I again want to give this the full five, but not sure. I don't get why more people don't like this. It's so underrated, and yet it's everything people love about Arnold and his movies. Loud, big, violent action, cheesy one-liners, a good villain, and this time it even has entertainingly bad CGI an Vanessa Williams, which are two things I'm always down with watching.
Mm
Arnold takes himself more seriously here it seems, at least until the second act. He delivers a great, movie-carrying performance as usual, and is compliment by the weirdly good Vanessa Williams, who ends up not being annoying. James Caan is a great villain, and definitely helps elevate it.
The action is exactly as you'd expect. With a plot involving big, hi-tech "chainguns", you know this is gonna be good. The opening house scene, the cabin scene, the plane scene, the zoo shootout, and the lab shootout are all cool, along with other scenes. The plane scene defies any logic or realism, and is lots of fun. The CGI is bad, but whatever. There's also a scene with a bad CGI crocodile that rips a dude's arm off, and attacks Arnold, who makes up for the effects by kicking it in the face and shooting it. The final battle though, is just perfect. It's total balls-out action, with Arnold becoming a one-man army as usual, and shooting tons of people with two chainguns before fighting James Caan on top of a giant metal container.
I really love this and recommend it. It needs more attention and is as good as most of Arnold's other films.
Arnold takes himself more seriously here it seems, at least until the second act. He delivers a great, movie-carrying performance as usual, and is compliment by the weirdly good Vanessa Williams, who ends up not being annoying. James Caan is a great villain, and definitely helps elevate it.
The action is exactly as you'd expect. With a plot involving big, hi-tech "chainguns", you know this is gonna be good. The opening house scene, the cabin scene, the plane scene, the zoo shootout, and the lab shootout are all cool, along with other scenes. The plane scene defies any logic or realism, and is lots of fun. The CGI is bad, but whatever. There's also a scene with a bad CGI crocodile that rips a dude's arm off, and attacks Arnold, who makes up for the effects by kicking it in the face and shooting it. The final battle though, is just perfect. It's total balls-out action, with Arnold becoming a one-man army as usual, and shooting tons of people with two chainguns before fighting James Caan on top of a giant metal container.
I really love this and recommend it. It needs more attention and is as good as most of Arnold's other films.
- monkeysgalore
- 22 avr. 2020
- Lien permanent
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe John Kruger role was originally offered to Sylvester Stallone. He absolutely hated the script, turned the offer down and instead starred in Détectives (1997).
- GaffesDeGuerin's agents say they traced the 'run' call from Kruger to Lee to an apartment in Chinatown. It is impossible to determine the location a pager receives a call, much less the specific apartment.
- Citations
Father Rodriguez: The police have returned to the safety of their doughnut shops.
- Autres versionsIn later versions of the movie, the reference of UBS meaning "Union de Bank Swiss" is changed to "United Bank of Syria."
- Bandes originalesWhere Do We Go From Here
Written by Linda Thompson, David Foster, Evan Kopelson and Douglas Pashley
Produced and arranged by David Foster
Performed by Vanessa Williams
Courtesy of Mercury Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Eraser
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 100 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 101 295 562 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 24 566 446 $ US
- 23 juin 1996
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 242 295 562 $ US
- Durée1 heure 55 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was L'effaceur (1996) officially released in India in English?
Répondre