ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,2/10
2,9 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA thirty-something southern woman searches for love, despite the burdens she carries with her.A thirty-something southern woman searches for love, despite the burdens she carries with her.A thirty-something southern woman searches for love, despite the burdens she carries with her.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Christine Renee Ward
- Sue
- (as Christy Ward)
Nancy Wilder
- Michelle
- (as Nancy Ellen Mills)
Commentaire en vedette
Joey Lauren Admans "Come Early Morning" seems almost like a continuation of the film that made its star, Ashley Judd, famous, Victor Nunez' "Ruby in Paradise." Both pictures are about girls trying to make a life for themselves in small southern towns, but Lucy, the protagonist of "Early Morning" is at least a decade older than Ruby. That is why it seems almost to be the next chapter in Ruby's story.
The decade has not treated the protagonist well. Where as Ruby was a sort of wide eyed innocent, Lucy is now a woman whose journey through life is encumbered by a lot of baggage.
She has problems relating to men on a romantic level, seeing them as either cold and unresponsive like her father or just mean and domineering like some of the other men in her family and the slugs she picks up in local bars.
So, somewhat predictably, when she meets a nice guy, she rejects him enough times that he eventually moves on.
Ashley Judd is such a fine, appealing actress that she keeps you glued to the screen, despite the somewhat predictable plot twists. But there is something about the screenplay which fails, for I never had much faith in her character, who in many ways seemed as emotionally bottled up as her father.
And that's the film's failure. "Ruby" ended on a hopeful note, if for no other reason than that the central character was smart, resourceful and had her whole life ahead of her. "Come Early Morning's" protagonist faces a cloudy future and while the film showed guts in admitting that, it didn't leave you wanting to see more of Lucy the way the earlier film made you want more of Ruby.
Nice try by everyone involved, but it was just too dark a picture in many ways.
One final note. So many films these days have no significant subplot. Lucy had some kind of construction business, but it was so downplayed that in the end, when she takes over the business, we don't exactly know how big an achievement that is, or if it really means more to her than just taking on harder work for no real pay off.
This film could have been more effective had her career or some other aspect of her life been more fully developed so that she faced some real test there as well. Subplots are important in that they give stories and their protagonists depth. And of course, the stakes always need to be higher for the protagonist, to make us care.
The decade has not treated the protagonist well. Where as Ruby was a sort of wide eyed innocent, Lucy is now a woman whose journey through life is encumbered by a lot of baggage.
She has problems relating to men on a romantic level, seeing them as either cold and unresponsive like her father or just mean and domineering like some of the other men in her family and the slugs she picks up in local bars.
So, somewhat predictably, when she meets a nice guy, she rejects him enough times that he eventually moves on.
Ashley Judd is such a fine, appealing actress that she keeps you glued to the screen, despite the somewhat predictable plot twists. But there is something about the screenplay which fails, for I never had much faith in her character, who in many ways seemed as emotionally bottled up as her father.
And that's the film's failure. "Ruby" ended on a hopeful note, if for no other reason than that the central character was smart, resourceful and had her whole life ahead of her. "Come Early Morning's" protagonist faces a cloudy future and while the film showed guts in admitting that, it didn't leave you wanting to see more of Lucy the way the earlier film made you want more of Ruby.
Nice try by everyone involved, but it was just too dark a picture in many ways.
One final note. So many films these days have no significant subplot. Lucy had some kind of construction business, but it was so downplayed that in the end, when she takes over the business, we don't exactly know how big an achievement that is, or if it really means more to her than just taking on harder work for no real pay off.
This film could have been more effective had her career or some other aspect of her life been more fully developed so that she faced some real test there as well. Subplots are important in that they give stories and their protagonists depth. And of course, the stakes always need to be higher for the protagonist, to make us care.
- Tony43
- 10 nov. 2006
- Lien permanent
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWriter and Director Joey Lauren Adams wrote the part of Lucy for herself, but gave the part to Ashley Judd when she decided she would be unable to direct the film and star in it.
- GaffesKeys can be seen hanging in Lucy's refrigerator. They were left in the fridge by teamsters who wanted to remember to shut it off before leaving for the day.
- Citations
Lucy Fowler: It's like grapefruit, right? It's real nice and stuff and people love it, but when they're done, what's left over is pretty ugly.
- Bandes originalesKilling the Blues
Performed by The Malcolm Holcombe (as Malcolm Holcombe) Group
Written by Rowland Salley
Published by Batt and Beer Music (ASCAP)
Courtesy of Bloodshot Records, from the album "The Slaughter Rule"
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Come Early Morning?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Come Early Morning
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 6 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 119 452 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 50 160 $ US
- 12 nov. 2006
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 161 408 $ US
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Un beau matin (2006) officially released in India in English?
Répondre