Une célébrité sur le déclin prend une drogue du marché noir: une substance réplicatrice de cellules qui crée temporairement une version plus jeune et meilleure d'elle-même.Une célébrité sur le déclin prend une drogue du marché noir: une substance réplicatrice de cellules qui crée temporairement une version plus jeune et meilleure d'elle-même.Une célébrité sur le déclin prend une drogue du marché noir: une substance réplicatrice de cellules qui crée temporairement une version plus jeune et meilleure d'elle-même.
- A remporté 1 oscar
- 138 victoires et 274 nominations au total
Edward Hamilton-Clark
- Fred
- (as Edward Hamilton Clark)
Commentaire en vedette
We live in an amazing time. After seeing a film with a score of 8, and even with 2 famous actresses, and even with a woman director, whom I had never heard of before, and even in the horror genre, and even in the body horror subgenre.
Wow! I told myself and immediately turned on the inflated ratings, waiting, not yet knowing why.
I won't hide it for long. That's exactly what happened.
The subgenre itself is very niche. Well, judge for yourself: open fractures, blood, intestines. The human body is mutating into something absolutely disgusting. By the way, it is not always only the human body that gets in this format.
As a subgenre, why not, but it has never been massive, but this film...
The film's wrapper is very attractive. An incomprehensible description and a bright, beautiful, dynamic trailer. You can understand what is depicted there only after viewing, so if the viewer has not familiarized himself with the genre on the profile resource, he will most likely be unpleasantly surprised.
But the ratings are high, so the audience was lured by the picture, they slipped an absolute abomination. By the standards of modern sleek mass cinema, that's for sure. And the viewer was satisfied?
I would bet that the viewer was just shocked + the film has a message and some kind of morality, so positive ratings still prevail.
But I, as a person for whom this genre has existed for 40 years, was satisfied only because of the acting and very cool makeup. They really molded this something at the end out of I don't even want to guess what.
But if you delve into the plot, the behavior of the characters sometimes, then the picture begins to float.
The fact that all men are goats, objectification of women is bad and that chasing beauty at the sacrifice of health is bad, I realized in the first 15 minutes. Why do I need 2 more hours?
Yes, the camera hitting the interesting places of women is cool done, but I did not come to an adult film.
The ending is so-so. The scene in the hall is deliberately slipping into trash. You understand that, so it was and it was. It feels like the film deliberately tried to be something sublime and about meaning until the last moment, so as to surprise so much in the end. It surprised me wonderfully.
It's a shame for the line with the classmate of the main character. It gets its logical conclusion, but in the middle of the film I thought that the authors would go away, but this is already subjective.
Objectively, if you evaluate and compare with others, not even the best representatives of the genre. This movie is just average. But it must be borne in mind that for a film like this, a score of 7 is already a wow success. For understanding, The Thing film has a score of 8.2, and after it there are films of the 30s and only after that the films of Cronenberg begin.
Just so you understand. If the score of a horror story is from 7 points, then this is already a masterpiece, but here ... 8 ... I do not understand. I'm blocking it.
Wow! I told myself and immediately turned on the inflated ratings, waiting, not yet knowing why.
I won't hide it for long. That's exactly what happened.
The subgenre itself is very niche. Well, judge for yourself: open fractures, blood, intestines. The human body is mutating into something absolutely disgusting. By the way, it is not always only the human body that gets in this format.
As a subgenre, why not, but it has never been massive, but this film...
The film's wrapper is very attractive. An incomprehensible description and a bright, beautiful, dynamic trailer. You can understand what is depicted there only after viewing, so if the viewer has not familiarized himself with the genre on the profile resource, he will most likely be unpleasantly surprised.
But the ratings are high, so the audience was lured by the picture, they slipped an absolute abomination. By the standards of modern sleek mass cinema, that's for sure. And the viewer was satisfied?
I would bet that the viewer was just shocked + the film has a message and some kind of morality, so positive ratings still prevail.
But I, as a person for whom this genre has existed for 40 years, was satisfied only because of the acting and very cool makeup. They really molded this something at the end out of I don't even want to guess what.
But if you delve into the plot, the behavior of the characters sometimes, then the picture begins to float.
The fact that all men are goats, objectification of women is bad and that chasing beauty at the sacrifice of health is bad, I realized in the first 15 minutes. Why do I need 2 more hours?
Yes, the camera hitting the interesting places of women is cool done, but I did not come to an adult film.
The ending is so-so. The scene in the hall is deliberately slipping into trash. You understand that, so it was and it was. It feels like the film deliberately tried to be something sublime and about meaning until the last moment, so as to surprise so much in the end. It surprised me wonderfully.
It's a shame for the line with the classmate of the main character. It gets its logical conclusion, but in the middle of the film I thought that the authors would go away, but this is already subjective.
Objectively, if you evaluate and compare with others, not even the best representatives of the genre. This movie is just average. But it must be borne in mind that for a film like this, a score of 7 is already a wow success. For understanding, The Thing film has a score of 8.2, and after it there are films of the 30s and only after that the films of Cronenberg begin.
Just so you understand. If the score of a horror story is from 7 points, then this is already a masterpiece, but here ... 8 ... I do not understand. I'm blocking it.
- berestov
- 22 sept. 2024
- Lien permanent
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRay Liotta was cast in the film in February 2022, but he died in May that year before he could film his scenes. Dennis Quaid replaced him, but Liotta is still mentioned in the director's "Thank You Notes" during the credits.
- GaffesThe toilet mirror reappears intact after being repeatedly smashed during the fight sequence. (Maybe someone poured 'the substance' on it. LOL)
- Citations
Elisabeth Sparkle: There's been a slight misuse of the Substance.
- Générique farfeluA special thanks in the credits is given to the many extras in the theater scene, who got covered in blood.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Episode dated 20 September 2024 (2024)
- Bandes originalesPump It Up
Written by Michael Hall and Leonardo Stella
Performed by Earl Gregory
Produced by Julien Deguines
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Substance?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Substance
- Lieux de tournage
- La Maison du Caviar - 21 Rue Quentin Bauchart, Paris 8, Paris, France(Elisabeth and Harvey at the restaurant)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 17 500 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 17 584 795 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 3 205 212 $ US
- 22 sept. 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 77 316 812 $ US
- Durée2 heures 21 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant