ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,3/10
11 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.A virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.A virtuous soldier tries to save people from an evil queen and a throne-seeking commander.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Shruti Haasan
- Pavazhamani
- (as Shruti K. Haasan)
Thambi Ramaiah
- Kodangi
- (as Thambi Ramayya)
Commentaire en vedette
Too much emphasis on the ingredients that went in to the film, but too little care for the end result? At least that's how I felt watching the movie. The best analogy I could give is trying to create a dish out of other tasty dishes like biryani, payasam, dosa etc., by mixing and mashing them together. By ingredients here, I mean all the characters like Lilliput, talking turtle, one eyed monster, the star cast, Visual effects etc., It's as if the makers were focused primarily on adding as much to the mix as possible.
It's a visual extravaganza for sure, but in the end isn't as engaging as one intend it to be, not by a long shot. I can't pin-point any single aspect because it fails on so many levels. For one the talent of so much star cast seemed to have been wasted. Is it the script? Is it the less than stellar songs and BGM? Is it the mismatch between the stars and the script? You decide. What I can say is that it failed to keep me engaged. Goes to show, just throwing in huge sum of money for extravagant sets, visual effects, big stars is not enough to create a successful movie.
Having said all of this I still gave it 4 stars for the bold attempt, which even though is a failed one. I really wished for this movie to match the hype surrounding it because at the end of the day I want our movie makers to think outside the box and such movies are hard to come by these days. I hope the makers can at least get the money they spent on it back, because I don't want the industry to get discouraged from making such movies.
It's a visual extravaganza for sure, but in the end isn't as engaging as one intend it to be, not by a long shot. I can't pin-point any single aspect because it fails on so many levels. For one the talent of so much star cast seemed to have been wasted. Is it the script? Is it the less than stellar songs and BGM? Is it the mismatch between the stars and the script? You decide. What I can say is that it failed to keep me engaged. Goes to show, just throwing in huge sum of money for extravagant sets, visual effects, big stars is not enough to create a successful movie.
Having said all of this I still gave it 4 stars for the bold attempt, which even though is a failed one. I really wished for this movie to match the hype surrounding it because at the end of the day I want our movie makers to think outside the box and such movies are hard to come by these days. I hope the makers can at least get the money they spent on it back, because I don't want the industry to get discouraged from making such movies.
- dimalatikrit
- 1 oct. 2015
- Lien permanent
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSri Devi regrets signing on for this movie.
- Autres versionsThe UK release was cut, the distributor chose to remove sight of both a blood spurt and a bloody incision across the front of a throat-cutting victim's neck in order to obtain a 12A classification. An uncut 15 classification was available.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Amar Akbar Anthony (2015)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Puli?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 800 000 000 INR (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 1 387 272 $ US
- Durée2 heures 35 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant