NOTE IMDb
7,8/10
53 k
MA NOTE
La belle trapéziste d'un cirque accepte d'épouser un des artistes du spectacle, mais ses amis difformes l'avertisse qu'elle n'est intéressée que par son héritage.La belle trapéziste d'un cirque accepte d'épouser un des artistes du spectacle, mais ses amis difformes l'avertisse qu'elle n'est intéressée que par son héritage.La belle trapéziste d'un cirque accepte d'épouser un des artistes du spectacle, mais ses amis difformes l'avertisse qu'elle n'est intéressée que par son héritage.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Roscoe Ates
- Roscoe
- (as Rosco Ates)
Prince Randian
- The Living Torso
- (as Rardion)
Commentaire à la une
I really dig 1930s horror movies. There's just something special about them that can never be recreated. A lot of it has to do with the talkies being new territory, many of the directors adapting German Expressionist techniques to Hollywood melodrama, and the freedom allowed before the Hayes Code really kicked in. Movies like 'Dracula', 'Frankenstein', 'Bride Of Frankenstein', 'Island Of Lost Souls', 'The Invisible Man' and 'White Zombie' are horror classics which still impress today. I wonder whether anyone will be watching the lame horror movies of today in seventy years for any other reason than some cheap laughs? Todd Browning made the transition from silent movies and directed the hugely successful 'Dracula' in 1931. It was a sensation and made Bela Lugosi a horror icon. Browning could pretty much do anything he chose after that. He chose to do 'Freaks'. Great for us as, not so great for him. The movie was universally reviled and even banned in some countries and his career never fully recovered. But 'Freaks' is an extraordinary movie with a lot of heart. It has faults, sure - some corny acting at times, and not so great production values - but it really doesn't matter. I don't know anyone who's seen it who hasn't been deeply affected by it. The reason the movie caused such a negative reaction back in the 1930s was because it used real circus performers including Zip the Pinhead and Radian "The Living Torso". Many people found this to be distasteful and exploitative, but the performers seemed to be glad to get the opportunity to work, and the whole crux of the movie is that the "freaks" are more decent than the "normal" Cleopatra (Olga Baclanova) , the trapeze artist who marries little person Hans (Harry Earls) for his money. 'Freaks' is still a very powerful and unique movie. It has inspired many creative people over the years from the Surrealists to The Ramones to Jodorowsky to David Lynch. 'Freaks' comes with my highest recommendation!
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe on-screen romance between Hans and Frieda was very subdued because the roles were being played by real life brother and sister Harry Earles and Daisy Earles.
- GaffesAt 43:40 when Cleo tosses the wine at Angeleno, she is standing in front of him, but the wine she throws comes from the far right side of the frame.
- Citations
Freaks: We accept you, one of us! Gooble Gobble!
- Versions alternativesReissue prints included a two-and-a-half minute written prologue about historical interpretations and contemporary studies of "misshapen misfits." These same prints remove the MGM Lion (the studio having disowned the film for many years).
- ConnexionsEdited into Histoire(s) du cinéma: Le contrôle de l'univers (1999)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 310 607 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 4 072 $US
- Durée1 heure 4 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Japanese language plot outline for Freaks, la monstrueuse parade (1932)?
Répondre