NOTE IMDb
7,1/10
14 k
MA NOTE
Après avoir braqué une banque mexicaine, Dad Longworth s'empare du butin et laisse son complice Rio se faire capturer, mais Rio s'échappe et part à la recherche de Dad en Californie.Après avoir braqué une banque mexicaine, Dad Longworth s'empare du butin et laisse son complice Rio se faire capturer, mais Rio s'échappe et part à la recherche de Dad en Californie.Après avoir braqué une banque mexicaine, Dad Longworth s'empare du butin et laisse son complice Rio se faire capturer, mais Rio s'échappe et part à la recherche de Dad en Californie.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Nommé pour 1 Oscar
- 3 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Elisha Cook Jr.
- Carvey
- (as Elisha Cook)
Rodolfo Acosta
- Mexican Rurale Captain
- (as Rudolph Acosta)
Avis à la une
From IMDb trivia:
Marlon Brando's first cut of the film was allegedly 5 hours long. He was reportedely unhappy with the final product, despite its box-office success. "Now, it's a good picture for them [Paramount]," he said upon its release, "but it's not the picture I made... now the characters in the film are black-and-white, not gray-and-human as I planned them."
Hand it to Brando to be dissatisfied with a film because he didn't manage to make it as long as he wanted to. Regardless of what Brando thought, this is a really fine Western and a unique one, too - it seems fresh and "new," like a Cool Man's West or something. Having Brando (when he was still looking fairly trim) in the lead role certainly gives it a certain glamor and the story itself - and execution - is great.
Overall I wish Brando had made another film after this but to the best of my knowledge this is really the only true film he ever made. If he was just trying to prove he could direct, he did - even if the film has its flaws, it's far from bad. In fact, it's very, very good - and extremely entertaining.
4.5/5
Marlon Brando's first cut of the film was allegedly 5 hours long. He was reportedely unhappy with the final product, despite its box-office success. "Now, it's a good picture for them [Paramount]," he said upon its release, "but it's not the picture I made... now the characters in the film are black-and-white, not gray-and-human as I planned them."
Hand it to Brando to be dissatisfied with a film because he didn't manage to make it as long as he wanted to. Regardless of what Brando thought, this is a really fine Western and a unique one, too - it seems fresh and "new," like a Cool Man's West or something. Having Brando (when he was still looking fairly trim) in the lead role certainly gives it a certain glamor and the story itself - and execution - is great.
Overall I wish Brando had made another film after this but to the best of my knowledge this is really the only true film he ever made. If he was just trying to prove he could direct, he did - even if the film has its flaws, it's far from bad. In fact, it's very, very good - and extremely entertaining.
4.5/5
Ben Johnson is mesmerizing in this picture; his natural ease with
screen acting was well-honed by this time and he has a
confidence, a greasy smoothness, in the part of Bob Amory that he
hadn't displayed up to this point. Perhaps it was because he was
working with two stellar actors from the method school that
spurred him to give them a run for their money. Or perhaps he was
more relaxed due to his extensive experience working in westerns
(or because he was one of the only authentic cowboys on the set).
Nevertheless, his contribution is equal to the leads, and far above
everyone else. And that's so small feat. Before Kubrick had left the
production, he obviously installed several of his favorite players:
Slim Pickens, Tim Carey, Elisha Cook Jr in supporting roles. Each
same part makes a significant contribution to the complexity and
charm of the story. But Johnson rises above them all. His snake- rattling Amory is just as pathetic as he is creepy. The scene in
which he chickens out of a gun duel with Brando is electrifying,
mostly due to the ambiguity in Johnson's close-ups. Watching it,
you're not quite sure if the character is too stupid to back down or
just plain chilled to the bone with fear.
screen acting was well-honed by this time and he has a
confidence, a greasy smoothness, in the part of Bob Amory that he
hadn't displayed up to this point. Perhaps it was because he was
working with two stellar actors from the method school that
spurred him to give them a run for their money. Or perhaps he was
more relaxed due to his extensive experience working in westerns
(or because he was one of the only authentic cowboys on the set).
Nevertheless, his contribution is equal to the leads, and far above
everyone else. And that's so small feat. Before Kubrick had left the
production, he obviously installed several of his favorite players:
Slim Pickens, Tim Carey, Elisha Cook Jr in supporting roles. Each
same part makes a significant contribution to the complexity and
charm of the story. But Johnson rises above them all. His snake- rattling Amory is just as pathetic as he is creepy. The scene in
which he chickens out of a gun duel with Brando is electrifying,
mostly due to the ambiguity in Johnson's close-ups. Watching it,
you're not quite sure if the character is too stupid to back down or
just plain chilled to the bone with fear.
I found this film quite remarkable on many levels. For one, it was the debut for Brando as director (and his only film direction since). Reportedly, it was taken after Kubrick left due to altercations. Well, this time, Brando has one foot in front of the camera, as well as one behind it. He does a great, solid job. In fact, this film never looked awkward or misguided -- it felt like an intelligent western helmed by an Anthony Mann or Raoul Walsh. To further boost the professional polish of the film, there is cinematographer Charles Lang (Magnificent Seven, How the West Was Won).
Within this polished piece of work, the muscle of the film is found in the wonderful character study. Here, the characters, like in many great stories, are complex, dark, tempermental. Although the film is about the hero's(or anti-hero's) thirst for revenge on a man who done him wrong, there's a romance in the film that is truly tender and fateful.
The magnet in this film would have to be Brando. (Karl Malden is great too). Brando's understated performance is of the subtle type, using his famous darting eyes to penetrate the characters and the viewer. He's one of my favorite all-time actors.
As with all great films, One-Eyed Jacks is a quiet masterpiece, displaying what every good film needs: great script, powerful acting, layered characterization, and be technically-sound.
Within this polished piece of work, the muscle of the film is found in the wonderful character study. Here, the characters, like in many great stories, are complex, dark, tempermental. Although the film is about the hero's(or anti-hero's) thirst for revenge on a man who done him wrong, there's a romance in the film that is truly tender and fateful.
The magnet in this film would have to be Brando. (Karl Malden is great too). Brando's understated performance is of the subtle type, using his famous darting eyes to penetrate the characters and the viewer. He's one of my favorite all-time actors.
As with all great films, One-Eyed Jacks is a quiet masterpiece, displaying what every good film needs: great script, powerful acting, layered characterization, and be technically-sound.
Malden betrays fellow bank robber Brando who escapes from prison, looking for revenge, but when he finds him, things are not that straight forward.
Sweeping, impressive western ostensibly just about revenge, but, bringing in sub plots and myriad support characters who hold their own, this is much more than that.
Brando is very Brando, all mumbling and supressed rage, but a solid lead nonetheless. It is though the other characters such as Pickens and Johnson who hold you attention, with particularly impressive performances from Malden and Pellicer.
I've seen this a couple of times and the picture quality is not great which it is a shame - often very good looking. Definitely one for restoration.
Sweeping, impressive western ostensibly just about revenge, but, bringing in sub plots and myriad support characters who hold their own, this is much more than that.
Brando is very Brando, all mumbling and supressed rage, but a solid lead nonetheless. It is though the other characters such as Pickens and Johnson who hold you attention, with particularly impressive performances from Malden and Pellicer.
I've seen this a couple of times and the picture quality is not great which it is a shame - often very good looking. Definitely one for restoration.
Prison escapee Brando (wearing only slightly less eye makeup than Liz Taylor in "Cleopatra") sets out to punish ex-friend Malden, but takes time out to romance Malden's step-daughter in this adult psychological western. The film was started by Stanley Kubrick, but when he took a hike, Brando stepped in to finish directing the film (his only effort behind the camera.) Several things about the film are striking. One is the dust/sand. This is a dusty, sandy movie! Even "Lawrence of Arabia" may not have had this much dust a' blowin'. Also unusual is the setting (oceanside.) Then there is the attention to the psyche. Rare for an early '60's western, the characters' thoughts and motivations are examined quite fully. Another striking feature is the parade of posed, extended shots of Brando merely staring. One might call these vanity shots.....especially if the subject of them is also directing the film! He also has a tendency to stick his behind and crotch in front of the camera. The story has a beginning, a middle and an end, but sometimes getting to them takes a while. The movie is just plain too long. It's not that it isn't compelling, but a few judicious cuts would have made it EXTREMELY compelling. Brando does a decent job (if one can understand all his patented mumbling), but Malden is the revelation. People familiar with him only from American Express commercials and "The Streets of San Francisco" will be amazed at the range he offers here. He is so much more menacing and sinister than most will remember him having been before. It's neat to see the two former costars of "A Streetcar Named Desire" square off. Another good performance comes by way of Pickens (who would later reunite with Malden in the deadly "Beyond the Poseidon Adventure".) He is a very effective redneck deputy. There's some nice work by relatively unknown actress Pellicer as Malden's step-daughter. Though her voice in her first scene seems inappropriately low, she improves throughout and does a fine job. Jurado has less to do as her mother, but still scores. Brando has a few sidekicks along for the ride. Johnson does well as a ruthless wanted man and Gilman (a costar in no less than five other Brando films) is okay. The film has some great scenery and some strong music. It's worst detriment is it's length which bogs down the sometimes slight story.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMarlon Brando insisted on getting drunk to film a scene in which he was supposed to act drunk, but he got too drunk to act or direct and so he insisted on repeating the process another day. Again he got too drunk to direct or act.
- GaffesIn the final shootout, Sheriff Longworth has a six-shooter, but shoots off eight bullets without reloading.
- Versions alternativesNew 4K digital restoration, 2 disc,from 2016, undertaken by Universal Pictures in partnership with The Film Foundation and in consultation with filmmakers Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg, with uncompressed monaural sound & lots of new extras.soundtrack on the Blu-ray
- ConnexionsFeatured in Moviedrome: One-Eyed Jacks (1988)
- Bandes originalesStreets of Laredo
(uncredited)
Traditional
[Hummed by Deputy Lon (Slim Pickens) when Luisa brings food to Rio at the jail]
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is One-Eyed Jacks?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 6 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 580 $US
- Durée2 heures 21 minutes
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Vengeance aux deux visages (1961) officially released in India in English?
Répondre