NOTE IMDb
6,5/10
18 k
MA NOTE
Une riche femme est retrouvée morte dans sa villa. Les soupçons se portent sur son mari, un magnat de la presse, qui y aurait vu un intérêt financier. Sa défense est alors réalisée par une a... Tout lireUne riche femme est retrouvée morte dans sa villa. Les soupçons se portent sur son mari, un magnat de la presse, qui y aurait vu un intérêt financier. Sa défense est alors réalisée par une avocate qui tombe peu à peu sous son charme.Une riche femme est retrouvée morte dans sa villa. Les soupçons se portent sur son mari, un magnat de la presse, qui y aurait vu un intérêt financier. Sa défense est alors réalisée par une avocate qui tombe peu à peu sous son charme.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Nommé pour 1 Oscar
- 4 nominations au total
James Winkler
- Ted Fitzpatrick
- (as James Winker)
Commentaire à la une
This courtroom thriller was one of the films that spawned a huge wave of copycats through the mid '80's and early '90's. Now, of course, these types of stories are on TV nightly in the glut of crime/law based shows. However, in 1985, audiences could still be (and were) riveted to the big screen by stories like this. Bridges plays a newspaper editor whose wife is brutally murdered along with their maid (in an opening sequence that is not overly graphic, yet is very disturbing.) Before long, he is prime suspect in the killings and is defended by a tentative, reluctant Close who is trying to redeem herself after some earlier unethical legal behavior. She squares off with slimy former prosecuting partner Coyote (in a slick, effective performance) to clear Bridges. She then, foolishly, becomes intimate with Bridges. There is constant doubt in her mind, as well as in the audience's, as to whether or not Bridges did the deed or not. Because the story is a tease and exists to manipulate and captivate the audience, there are plot holes galore. However, the film works very well on a visceral level, providing twists and shocks along the way (including one startling break-in near the end which is jarring no matter how many times it is seen.) The film's greatest strength is the acting, notably Close. Unlike later Eszterhas scripts, in which no one is sympathetic, she is a heroine to root for, despite her flaws. She brings great conviction to her poorly conceived role. Bridges does well also as the perfectly moussed, tan dreamboat who might be a savage murderer. Loggia brings a welcome salty edge to the film with his foul-mouthed portrayal of Close's investigator friend. All cussing and cigarettes, he is a stock Eszterhas character, but is acted well. There are other fine smaller roles played by Dehner as a crusty judge, Young as a haughty rich-bitch and Austin (an underrated actress) as an attack victim. Close has two annoying kids and a wimpy ex-husband to make her life that much more unbearable. Drawbacks to the film would be the illogic of the script and the bizarre editing of the courtroom scenes in which the clothing Bridges and (especially) Close wear inexplicably switch! Her hair is also consistently inconsistent throughout...(within scenes!)...flat one moment, curly the next, varying in height and swoop, etc.... The discordant music by Barry is very unsettling and his use of low piano keys doubtlessly inspired Jerry Goldsmith for "Basic Instinct". It's the same type of sound. Folks expecting a watertight story will be disappointed. Those who just want to be entertained and spooked should love it.
- Poseidon-3
- 26 août 2002
- Permalien
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAn urban folklore exists that suggests that there was an alternate ending that alters the identity of the killer. An alternate ending does not exist, but the original ending was indeed re-filmed, when the initial release audience complained that the face of the killer was not clearly shown. In the original release, the unmasked killer's face was shown for eighteen frames (less than a second). Another nine seconds was later spliced into the corrected version, clearly resolving the mystery and showing the killer.
- GaffesDuring the final court day scene, Teddy Barnes' clothes change. This is because this scene was originally shot as two separate days, but were later edited into one final court day.
- Citations
[last lines]
Sam Ransom: Fuck him. He was trash.
- ConnexionsEdited into The Green Fog (2017)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Jagged Edge?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Jagged Edge
- Lieux de tournage
- 305 Spruce Street, San Francisco, Californie, États-Unis(Teddy Barnes Residence)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 15 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 40 491 165 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 4 094 091 $US
- 6 oct. 1985
- Montant brut mondial
- 40 491 165 $US
- Durée1 heure 48 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for À double tranchant (1985)?
Répondre