Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe story of a Jewish writer, from his life as a young boy in Montreal to his more complicated grown-up life.The story of a Jewish writer, from his life as a young boy in Montreal to his more complicated grown-up life.The story of a Jewish writer, from his life as a young boy in Montreal to his more complicated grown-up life.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 5 victoires et 8 nominations au total
Avis à la une
I was a James woods fan since Videodrome.
My best friend and I went to our local movie theatre and saw this movie. As a kid but a fan of film at a really young age. My mother and I would watch movies that are now only on TMC now.
That's how I started learning film instead of watching movies.
Now I go from so bad it's good stuff to seeing techniques that were poorly reviewed to the same shots in other films to be "oh my goodness that is great". I'm paraphrasing obviously. 🙄 Anyway to rewatch this film is a conundrum ... Do I look at it as the new me sees the art or do I not and use the memory as a way to assess film now ?
This movie drew me in on one level only but made me look at Allen Arkin as another actor to follow.
So that's my dilemma.
The film to me was so out of my depth as I watched it. Then there was a sad strange feeling that I knew this story. I had seen it in standard TV series at the time but only ever touched on.
I was 17 and finally found that the joy of film is the most satisfying thing that became my escape to let my mind wander and reason to dig deep and realize that art is art and to judge a piece for its time.
Ok I think I've ranted enough.
My best friend and I went to our local movie theatre and saw this movie. As a kid but a fan of film at a really young age. My mother and I would watch movies that are now only on TMC now.
That's how I started learning film instead of watching movies.
Now I go from so bad it's good stuff to seeing techniques that were poorly reviewed to the same shots in other films to be "oh my goodness that is great". I'm paraphrasing obviously. 🙄 Anyway to rewatch this film is a conundrum ... Do I look at it as the new me sees the art or do I not and use the memory as a way to assess film now ?
This movie drew me in on one level only but made me look at Allen Arkin as another actor to follow.
So that's my dilemma.
The film to me was so out of my depth as I watched it. Then there was a sad strange feeling that I knew this story. I had seen it in standard TV series at the time but only ever touched on.
I was 17 and finally found that the joy of film is the most satisfying thing that became my escape to let my mind wander and reason to dig deep and realize that art is art and to judge a piece for its time.
Ok I think I've ranted enough.
This is a wonderful movie that never sinks into sentimentality or farce. It would have been easy to overplay both of the Alan Arkin and the James Woods roles, and this movie could have become sappy or too slapstick. This is a gem of a movie that, unfortunately, probably has limited appeal. I think that it was finely written and wonderfully acted and deserves more attention that it has received.
THE best movie of the millenium. (Even better than "..And Justice for All").
First (& maybe only) "Feelgood" movie (ever?) that did not sink into the depths of sentimentality. Both Arkin & Woods gave great performances .
First (& maybe only) "Feelgood" movie (ever?) that did not sink into the depths of sentimentality. Both Arkin & Woods gave great performances .
I love the way both Joshua & his father rip right through the arrogant BS of religiosity & the stuffy uptight pretentiousness of the rich & powerful. Most refreshing to watch these rare & delightful characters call spit "spit."
Josh's mom is a real down to earth treat as well, while the relationship between Joshua & Pauline is really touching with its openness & authenticity.
Alan Arkin at this funniest.
Josh's mom is a real down to earth treat as well, while the relationship between Joshua & Pauline is really touching with its openness & authenticity.
Alan Arkin at this funniest.
i love mainstream movies just like the next guy.. gladiator, traffic, usual suspects, shawshank redemption etc. this is a movie very different from those.. but still a great movie. alan arkin is very funny. james woods makes his best role.. and gabriell lazure is a stunning woman...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe last feature film of Alexander Knox.
- Versions alternativesCo-produced by the Canadian National Broadcaster CBC, Joshua Then & Now was aired as a four-hour miniseries, with many scenes and subplots not included in the theatrical version.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Alan Arkin: Live from the TCM Classic Film Festival (2015)
- Bandes originalesSituation
Performed by The Dazzlers
Written by Steve Scala
Published by T.K. Publishing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Joshua Then and Now?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Eine Liebe in Montreal
- Lieux de tournage
- Royal Albert Hall, Londres, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(Joshua is arrested on the steps from Prince Consort Road)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 10 940 000 $CA (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 542 420 $US
- Montant brut mondial
- 542 420 $US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Joshua Then and Now (1985) officially released in India in English?
Répondre