She Must Be Seeing Things

1987
1h 35min

NOTE IMDb

MA NOTE

Sheila Dabney and Lois Weaver in She Must Be Seeing Things (1987)

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be s... Tout lireJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be seeing things: she's jealous, convinced Jo is having an affair with a man and follows her. ... Tout lireJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be seeing things: she's jealous, convinced Jo is having an affair with a man and follows her. But is it Jo she's following, or someone who looks like her? Jo is either too exhausted to... Tout lire

Réalisation
- Sheila McLaughlin
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

5,8/10

MA NOTE

Réalisation
- Sheila McLaughlin
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Photos

Avis des utilisateurs3

5,884

Avis à la une

9KaliKali

Well worth the time

I wasn't too sure what to make of this movie - I kept seeing the box in the video store, I had the soundtrack that John Zorn composed, but had never gotten around to seeing it until recently. Whilst some of the acting is a little heavy-handed, the story kept me going even though I basically knew nothing about the movie in advance.

2defghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

I Must Be Seeing Things (re: the 7/10 rating this film has)

This is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Apart from the immensely irritating soundtrack and god-awful acting, there's also the completely retarded scenes in which Agatha reads Jo's diary aloud (I'm not sure which of these is stupider; the one where she spins on her chair non-stop so the director has an 'interesting' shot or the one where as soon as all her colleagues have left a meeting she starts reading aloud in the boardroom) and pretty much nothing to recommend this film whatsoever.

There's also the ridiculous casting of butch ladies in a ridiculous amount of the secondary roles; how many old-school pawn shops do you know that are run by muscular blondes with spikey hair?

Seriously, this sucks worse than any other film I can think of. It seems to exist solely to give queer theorists something to talk about.

1rcthornton-09722