Il pleuvait des oiseaux

The story revolves around four elderly people, three men and a woman, joined by two secondary characters. One of the men dies at the very beginning of the film, but his spiritual presence is nonetheless felt. Each main character is surviving a difficult past and takes refuge in an individual cabin in the woods, near a lake. Friendships and amorous relationships are formed in idyllic settings, during a beautiful summer without rain and mosquitoes. In the meantime, a forest fire is approaching. What is the meaning of existence for each of the main characters? What will be their future?

These premises are interesting, but unfortunately the film lacks rhythm and lags. One feels that for some scenes, the film director refused to leave images on the floor of the editing room, notably with regards to an erotic scene that brings nothing to the story and whose object was probably aesthetic. 10-20 minutes of film should have been cut to accelerate the pace and generate more curiosity than waiting time. As for the acting, while Gilbert Sicotte and the extras are very good, most others have difficulty adopting the right tone, thus making them less convincing, which I would fault on insufficient actor direction. Finally, the action takes place in a sanitized version of nature; no mosquitoes, no black flies, no dirt, no rain and no preparation for the coming winter. You buy this if you live in the city; you don't otherwise.

But this is the director's third full length film, after Familia (2005) and Gabrielle (2013), the latter being much more engaging and convincing. She is learning the hard way, but she is promising.

I had not been in a movie theater for a long, long time, watching the odd movie at home on my TV screen and choosing them from YouTube when possible. By doing so I can just stop whatever I am watching by a click and not waste my time but in a theater all one can do is get up and get out. Which I did after about one hour. That's all I could take of this rather boring film full of clichés and insipid dialogue. Some of the scenes were so ridiculous that it became embarrassing watching them. You don't have to believe me so just try and watch this needlessly long movie yourself. Good luck.

Quel film plate. Pas d'histoire. Pas de musique. Caméra qui « shake » tout le temps. Perdez pas votre temps avec ça.

Halftone film. One of those rare films where the actresses and actors are all wonderful, where the camera is used very very well, where the photography is sometimes brilliant, where the soundtrack is adequate, where old age is filmed in a simple, respectful way and without scruples, but where the recipe does not work. Finally, it ends up taking hold in the last minutes with an ending that we don't see coming and which falls on us like a ton of bricks; ouch! This outcome and the excellence of the acting save a scenario which lacks depth and which is rather a rather banal collage of dull dialogues.

Based on the novel by Jocelyne Saucier: in rural, northern Quebec, three elderly men (played by Gilbert Sicotte, Rémy Girard, and Kenneth Welsh) reside in a cottage in the woods, living as separately as possible from outside society. Their lives change as an elderly woman (Andrée Lachapelle) escapes her nearby psychiatric hospital to live with them and a young photographer/historian (Ève Landry) wants to know more of their experiences during a massive forest fire that devastated the region many years before.

This film is a fascinating story about fascinating outliers and how they connect with each other. Another character, played by Éric Robidoux plays the nephew of the elderly woman. He manages to connect the other unusual characters with each other while adding a few quirks of his own to the story.

Occasionally, some of the connections are confusing or unexplained. And there is a serious flaw in that there seems to be no police investigation after a senior psychiatric patient has gone missing. But luckily, the strengths of the film outweigh the flaws.

The story and its characters provide a deep perspective of life from people who live differently - sometimes not by their own choices. While it is sometimes easy to dislike the historian for acting like a jerk, her perspective is also given validity. Here, there is good ambiguity. And the acting by the elder actors add a lot to the film's beauty especially that of Lachapelle, her final film as she died late last year. And let's not forget the breathtaking views of the forest and lake. - dbamateurcritic