Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.The true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.The true story of seven 1960's call girls, taken straight from the accounts of a practicing Hollywood sex therapist.
Danika Gould
- Sandra
- (as Danika Galindo)
Sean Gibson
- Bertie
- (non crédité)
Mariella Jacqueline
- Title Sequence Girl
- (non crédité)
Adam Trash
- Ronnie
- (non crédité)
Commentaire à la une
This period movie set in the 1960's documents the sad lifestyle for call girls ensconced in a Hollywood hotel.
The plot is thin, consisting of having the girls each describe their thoughts and memories while bathing or adjusting their lingerie. One of them has a typewriter and proceeds to type while her derriere is prominently visible clad only in her underwear.
If we were in a hidden camera secreted in their boudoirs, you could argue the whole purpose of this movie is voyeurism.
Character development is minimal. So there is no bond between the actors and the audience. The seedier side of the girls' profession and risks they take is glossed over. The only "John" appears late in the sequence and is an equally sad person. The rating for this flick is accurate.
The production quality is claustrophobic and unimaginative with no outdoor shots. The camerawork and direction is adequate.
The script was very boring. There are basically several scenes, which are repeated, like a girl bathing with a soapy rotary dial phone on the edge of the bath tub.
For fans of 1960's big hairstyles and make up, this is a parade of several women coiffing, applying and adjusting their appearances. Otherwise, fast forward through the movie to take in any attractive eye candy that appeals to you.
The plot is thin, consisting of having the girls each describe their thoughts and memories while bathing or adjusting their lingerie. One of them has a typewriter and proceeds to type while her derriere is prominently visible clad only in her underwear.
If we were in a hidden camera secreted in their boudoirs, you could argue the whole purpose of this movie is voyeurism.
Character development is minimal. So there is no bond between the actors and the audience. The seedier side of the girls' profession and risks they take is glossed over. The only "John" appears late in the sequence and is an equally sad person. The rating for this flick is accurate.
The production quality is claustrophobic and unimaginative with no outdoor shots. The camerawork and direction is adequate.
The script was very boring. There are basically several scenes, which are repeated, like a girl bathing with a soapy rotary dial phone on the edge of the bath tub.
For fans of 1960's big hairstyles and make up, this is a parade of several women coiffing, applying and adjusting their appearances. Otherwise, fast forward through the movie to take in any attractive eye candy that appeals to you.
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesInspired partly by the 1959 book "The Power of Sexual Surrender" by Marie N. Robinson, M.D.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Big Hair, Long Lashes?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 10 minutes
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Big Hair, Long Lashes (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre