Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them wit... Tout lireA gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them with a Korean wedding banquet.A gay man makes a deal with his lesbian friend: a green-card marriage for him, in exchange for in vitro fertilization treatments for her. Plans evolve as Min's grandmother surprises them with a Korean wedding banquet.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 5 nominations au total
Jeffrey Liang
- Lady Shu Mai
- (as Jeffrey Liang 'Miss Shu Mai')
Françoise Yip
- Susan
- (as Francoise Yip)
Avis à la une
I know, I know, as a gay man I was supposed to love this movie (just like I did the original). But sad to say, this remake is not very enjoyable.
They get credit for putting new twists on the plot vs. The original, but pacing is waaaaay too slow and it takes forever to get going. Quite honestly, there's very little humor. The first hour drags and is pretty boring, and it's not until the grandmother shows up that things get interesting. The grandmother, in fact, is the most interesting character in the entire movie. Dialogue is mundane and the few funny lines stand out simply because there are so few of them.
With all the talent they had on hand, this could've been so much better.
They get credit for putting new twists on the plot vs. The original, but pacing is waaaaay too slow and it takes forever to get going. Quite honestly, there's very little humor. The first hour drags and is pretty boring, and it's not until the grandmother shows up that things get interesting. The grandmother, in fact, is the most interesting character in the entire movie. Dialogue is mundane and the few funny lines stand out simply because there are so few of them.
With all the talent they had on hand, this could've been so much better.
It's hard to understand why classic films, such as Ang Lee's 1993 classic, 'The Wedding Banquet' need to be reimagined or updated. More times than not, the second attempts don't even come close to the original. The 2025 version of this film is no exception. First of all, they put a west coast spin on what was a quintessential New York picture. That was the first mistake. Secondly, the actors were lame compared to those in the '93 film. The screenplay and direction were awful as well. This is a film that should never have been remade. When you have a perfect product, such as Ang Lee's masterpiece, don't tamper with perfection. This newer picture does nothing to advance the LGBTQ+ agenda in a positive way, unlike its predecessor which was bold, poignant and a major contribution to our community.
Watched at the 2025 Sundance Film Festival.
I wasn't sure how a remake would work with And Lee's classic queer romantic comedy but color me surprise, the remake does a pretty good job on being creative from it's source material with new energy, humor, and atmosphere. Andrew Ahn is a director I have been keeping up with as his work Spa Night, Driveways and Fire Island have been pretty great and emotional engaging to observe. Here, Ahn's direction on the atmosphere, dialogue, and the character dynamics are pretty good. Being able to capture the emotions, hilarious dynamics, and some of the oddity and funny moments in both heartwarming and somewhat chaotic ways.
With a good presentation, all of the performances are great as many of the cast members are able to provide fun energy, personality and purpose to their characters. Bowen Yang particular stands out at his best. Narrative-wise, I do appreciate some new themes they were able to explore but there are some moments that felt a little uninspired with the concepts and dynamics that Ahn explores. Including how the production feels almost too fake like something from Netflix and some of the structure feels a little strange, which does make some moments a bit distracting and dragging a bit.
But overall, I didn't expect much for this remake but it was surprisingly not too bad and it went beyond the expectations.
I wasn't sure how a remake would work with And Lee's classic queer romantic comedy but color me surprise, the remake does a pretty good job on being creative from it's source material with new energy, humor, and atmosphere. Andrew Ahn is a director I have been keeping up with as his work Spa Night, Driveways and Fire Island have been pretty great and emotional engaging to observe. Here, Ahn's direction on the atmosphere, dialogue, and the character dynamics are pretty good. Being able to capture the emotions, hilarious dynamics, and some of the oddity and funny moments in both heartwarming and somewhat chaotic ways.
With a good presentation, all of the performances are great as many of the cast members are able to provide fun energy, personality and purpose to their characters. Bowen Yang particular stands out at his best. Narrative-wise, I do appreciate some new themes they were able to explore but there are some moments that felt a little uninspired with the concepts and dynamics that Ahn explores. Including how the production feels almost too fake like something from Netflix and some of the structure feels a little strange, which does make some moments a bit distracting and dragging a bit.
But overall, I didn't expect much for this remake but it was surprisingly not too bad and it went beyond the expectations.
Very surprised by all the positive reviews (both critics and movie-goers) of The Wedding Banquet.
My partner and I were very much looking forward to it - but were seriously disappointed.
Various reviewers described the film as hilarious, charming, heartwarming.
We did not see that movie.
It was like spending time - too much time - with neighbors who mostly converse in therapy-speak platitudes, irony-speak chatter and in the case of one of the characters, complain incessantly about their mother.
In addition to the annoying therapy-speak dialogue, the characters were not so interesting in our opinion. Angela's character (Kelly Marie Tran) was especially churlish and unappealing - it was impossible to see why Lee (Lily Gladstone) would have been in a relationship with Angela. For different reasons, it was difficult to see why Chris and Min were together.
The few interesting and thoughtful parts of the movie, in our opinion, were the scenes of Min and his grandmother.
I recall admiring the original Wedding Banquet - will watch it again to see.
My partner and I were very much looking forward to it - but were seriously disappointed.
Various reviewers described the film as hilarious, charming, heartwarming.
We did not see that movie.
It was like spending time - too much time - with neighbors who mostly converse in therapy-speak platitudes, irony-speak chatter and in the case of one of the characters, complain incessantly about their mother.
In addition to the annoying therapy-speak dialogue, the characters were not so interesting in our opinion. Angela's character (Kelly Marie Tran) was especially churlish and unappealing - it was impossible to see why Lee (Lily Gladstone) would have been in a relationship with Angela. For different reasons, it was difficult to see why Chris and Min were together.
The few interesting and thoughtful parts of the movie, in our opinion, were the scenes of Min and his grandmother.
I recall admiring the original Wedding Banquet - will watch it again to see.
I had all but forgotten about the original 1993 movie until after I saw this one, and watching them back to back really makes you appreciate a brilliant filmmaker like Ang Lee that comes but once in a generation.
Without comparing it to the OG, my initial thought of this remake was that I wouldn't have lasted 20 minutes if it weren't created for audiences like me (millennial, Chinese, green card, marriage, IVF). It has the premise of a romcom but without the comedy, the design of an indie drama without the raw emotional punch except in a few places, and all the insufferable qualities of contemporary mainstream filmmaking.
After watching the original, my main complaint of this film is now...there's no banquet! The OG was brimming with culture, a true banquet made to dazzle, literally and figuratively. It appears filmmaking, like banquets, has become a lost art.
Without comparing it to the OG, my initial thought of this remake was that I wouldn't have lasted 20 minutes if it weren't created for audiences like me (millennial, Chinese, green card, marriage, IVF). It has the premise of a romcom but without the comedy, the design of an indie drama without the raw emotional punch except in a few places, and all the insufferable qualities of contemporary mainstream filmmaking.
After watching the original, my main complaint of this film is now...there's no banquet! The OG was brimming with culture, a true banquet made to dazzle, literally and figuratively. It appears filmmaking, like banquets, has become a lost art.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRemake of Ang Lee's 1993 original.
- Citations
Angela Chen: Everything in this house is gay!
- ConnexionsReferences Le Magicien d'Oz (1939)
- Bandes originalesYoung Hearts Run Free (2023 Edit)
Written by Dave Crawford (as David Bernard Crawford)
Performed by Candi Staton & Benji La Vida
Courtesy of Warner Records Inc./Rhino Entertainment Company
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 囍宴
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 090 228 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 918 598 $US
- 20 avr. 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 397 273 $US
- Durée1 heure 43 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant