बेला स्व को उन ताकतों को रोकना होगा जो पृथ्वी की आखिरी उम्मीद को नष्ट करना चाहती हैं.बेला स्व को उन ताकतों को रोकना होगा जो पृथ्वी की आखिरी उम्मीद को नष्ट करना चाहती हैं.बेला स्व को उन ताकतों को रोकना होगा जो पृथ्वी की आखिरी उम्मीद को नष्ट करना चाहती हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The negative reviews are very strange for this show. I found it kept my interest and I am keen to follow where it leads. Silly arguments about what is and what is not science fiction are irritating and lead nowhere. I will continue to watch as it is intriguing.
I think you people are missing the point.
No, it's not bad acting, or bad CGI or what ever you happened to whine about.
Yes, Moonies are strange and come across like annoying hippies who say and do strange things and behave like lunatics. That's the whole point! I think they play it rather well.
I agree, the angry pilot chick from Earth is extremely unlikable and behaves like sociopath. But that's the whole point - Earth is gone off the deep end! Everyone is probably like that or worst.
Why do expect them to have those same values like you have today? Behave like you do? Try traveling. Different cultures, different values, different social ques etc. And you do not even need to get off world.
Very few sci-fi books and films actually pay attention to this - people, situations etc have to come across a bit unusual or even awkward for us.
Put it like this, If you could time-travel 100 year back in time and behave the way you do today, everyone will think there is something seriously wrong with you. It works both ways.
No, it's not bad acting, or bad CGI or what ever you happened to whine about.
Yes, Moonies are strange and come across like annoying hippies who say and do strange things and behave like lunatics. That's the whole point! I think they play it rather well.
I agree, the angry pilot chick from Earth is extremely unlikable and behaves like sociopath. But that's the whole point - Earth is gone off the deep end! Everyone is probably like that or worst.
Why do expect them to have those same values like you have today? Behave like you do? Try traveling. Different cultures, different values, different social ques etc. And you do not even need to get off world.
Very few sci-fi books and films actually pay attention to this - people, situations etc have to come across a bit unusual or even awkward for us.
Put it like this, If you could time-travel 100 year back in time and behave the way you do today, everyone will think there is something seriously wrong with you. It works both ways.
Why? They talked funny, they cursed in Chinese and I had trouble understanding what was going on. Of course it was happening hundreds of years from now. Now it is a classic and an inspired science fiction show. It was original and unique. So is "Moonhaven". The "moonies" do act and talk different though the "earthers" talk more "normal". But wouldn't people in a hundred years talk different than us, have different ways of saying things. Give this a chance; it is unique and different. I also didn't like "The Expanse" at first because they "talked different".
Wow, a lot of people seem to hate this, and I'm going to say something about that, but first let me just talk about how much I like the series.
In Moonhaven, humans have completely trashed the earth. To try and save the planet they installed an advanced AI on the moon which moon colonists work with to both create technology to heal the earth and to create a new societal approach to keep man from continuing his destructive ways.
This utopian moon colony is seriously hippy-dippy. People learn elaborate group dances to commemorate good and bad events and the job of police is not to solve crimes (the AI can do that) but to help people heal from the trauma of violence.
The creators of this show really thought through this world. You can argue about whether this tribal hippy thing is what an A. I. would create, but if you think about the forces that make man so destructive it actually seems like a pretty reasonable approach. And the show has detailed social structures, rituals, and language changes. (It also at times has an odd medieval-ish quality to it.)
The series begins just before the moon colonists are sheduled to come to earth and begin the healing process. But things aren't that simple. A woman is murdered. Her earther sister (beautifully played by Emma McDonald with a dry, Zendaya-like cynicism) is a pilot who happens to have come to the moon just then. Soon there's more violence. The genial police begin to realize there's more going on than their AI has solved (or told them). Meanwhile there are political conflicts that could bring down the earth-healing plan.
The first episode begins at a leisurely pace made up for with its originality, but soon there are a lot of twists and turns and things really start moving.
So, great sci-fi, world building, a compelling mystery, political intrigue. What's not to like?
For a lot of people on IMDB, the answer is ... everything! This series has a ton of 1-star ratings, and it's very puzzling to me.
Now, one thing that can kill a good show's ratings are anti-"woke" folk downvoting, but from the reviews it doesn't seem that's what's happening here, even though its diverse cast and powerful women are what often triggers these people.
But a lot of the criticisms don't make much sense. For example, some say the show is "cliched and predictable" yet those same people complain about the bland cliched utopia which means they don't understand that a utopia in sci-fi almost invariably is rotting underneath. Some people find the female lead unlikable, but she's a classic anti-hero who represents the earther brutality the mooners are supposed to heal, so why *wouldn't* she be abrasive? Some people say the series is slow moving and yet some say it's not as good as the movie Dune which moved like paint drying.
I feel part of the issue is expectations for sci-fi. For some, sci-fi is all about the CGI and the epic mythmaking. These are the people who want Star Wars and Terminator and don't understand the appeal of an Ursula Le Guin. Building an intricate world is, for them, not sci-fi, because it's not viscerally exciting. For me, though, it's intellectually exciting.
I'm not saying people have to like the show, but the critics are being ridiculous. In my life I've given maybe 2 series a 1-star rating, yet half the people here give it a 1 and say that the acting and writing are incompetent, which is not a reasonable or sensible critique. If someone finds it a little too slow, or finds the premise unconvincing, or just doesn't like the characters, that's their prerogative and there's no right and wrong in personal taste. But this level of antagonism is just ... weird.
This is why I'm honestly wondering if perhaps the anti-woke brigade is simply getting more strategic and trying to downvote shows without showing their hand so obviously. Because there's really nothing in this series that should reasonably be making people so mad unless they utterly hate diversity and strong women and hippy-dippy utopias.
But I can't ascribe beliefs to critics that they aren't themselves claiming, so perhaps it's something else. It just makes no sense to me.
In short, it's a great story, great sci-fi world building, fun characters, and a nice mix of drama, humor, action, and intrigue. I highly recommend it.
In Moonhaven, humans have completely trashed the earth. To try and save the planet they installed an advanced AI on the moon which moon colonists work with to both create technology to heal the earth and to create a new societal approach to keep man from continuing his destructive ways.
This utopian moon colony is seriously hippy-dippy. People learn elaborate group dances to commemorate good and bad events and the job of police is not to solve crimes (the AI can do that) but to help people heal from the trauma of violence.
The creators of this show really thought through this world. You can argue about whether this tribal hippy thing is what an A. I. would create, but if you think about the forces that make man so destructive it actually seems like a pretty reasonable approach. And the show has detailed social structures, rituals, and language changes. (It also at times has an odd medieval-ish quality to it.)
The series begins just before the moon colonists are sheduled to come to earth and begin the healing process. But things aren't that simple. A woman is murdered. Her earther sister (beautifully played by Emma McDonald with a dry, Zendaya-like cynicism) is a pilot who happens to have come to the moon just then. Soon there's more violence. The genial police begin to realize there's more going on than their AI has solved (or told them). Meanwhile there are political conflicts that could bring down the earth-healing plan.
The first episode begins at a leisurely pace made up for with its originality, but soon there are a lot of twists and turns and things really start moving.
So, great sci-fi, world building, a compelling mystery, political intrigue. What's not to like?
For a lot of people on IMDB, the answer is ... everything! This series has a ton of 1-star ratings, and it's very puzzling to me.
Now, one thing that can kill a good show's ratings are anti-"woke" folk downvoting, but from the reviews it doesn't seem that's what's happening here, even though its diverse cast and powerful women are what often triggers these people.
But a lot of the criticisms don't make much sense. For example, some say the show is "cliched and predictable" yet those same people complain about the bland cliched utopia which means they don't understand that a utopia in sci-fi almost invariably is rotting underneath. Some people find the female lead unlikable, but she's a classic anti-hero who represents the earther brutality the mooners are supposed to heal, so why *wouldn't* she be abrasive? Some people say the series is slow moving and yet some say it's not as good as the movie Dune which moved like paint drying.
I feel part of the issue is expectations for sci-fi. For some, sci-fi is all about the CGI and the epic mythmaking. These are the people who want Star Wars and Terminator and don't understand the appeal of an Ursula Le Guin. Building an intricate world is, for them, not sci-fi, because it's not viscerally exciting. For me, though, it's intellectually exciting.
I'm not saying people have to like the show, but the critics are being ridiculous. In my life I've given maybe 2 series a 1-star rating, yet half the people here give it a 1 and say that the acting and writing are incompetent, which is not a reasonable or sensible critique. If someone finds it a little too slow, or finds the premise unconvincing, or just doesn't like the characters, that's their prerogative and there's no right and wrong in personal taste. But this level of antagonism is just ... weird.
This is why I'm honestly wondering if perhaps the anti-woke brigade is simply getting more strategic and trying to downvote shows without showing their hand so obviously. Because there's really nothing in this series that should reasonably be making people so mad unless they utterly hate diversity and strong women and hippy-dippy utopias.
But I can't ascribe beliefs to critics that they aren't themselves claiming, so perhaps it's something else. It just makes no sense to me.
In short, it's a great story, great sci-fi world building, fun characters, and a nice mix of drama, humor, action, and intrigue. I highly recommend it.
Should you even be able to give a review if you only watch 5 minutes? The amount of 1 & 2's from people who don't even watch and actually hate sci fi sorta affects the overall rating. It's not Blade Runner but it's nowhere near this low of a rating.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाActor Dominic Monaghan thrusted into fame when he starred in the TV series LOST when he played Charlie. He also starred in the Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Moonhaven have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें