VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
5920
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Cecile è una giovane ragazza decadente che vive con il suo ricco padre playboy, Raymond. Quando Anne, la vecchia amante di Raymond, arriva nella villa, Cecile ha paura del suo modo di vivere... Leggi tuttoCecile è una giovane ragazza decadente che vive con il suo ricco padre playboy, Raymond. Quando Anne, la vecchia amante di Raymond, arriva nella villa, Cecile ha paura del suo modo di vivere.Cecile è una giovane ragazza decadente che vive con il suo ricco padre playboy, Raymond. Quando Anne, la vecchia amante di Raymond, arriva nella villa, Cecile ha paura del suo modo di vivere.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Nominato ai 1 BAFTA Award
- 2 candidature totali
Tutte Lemkow
- Pierre Schube
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Maryse Martin
- Undetermined Secondary Role
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Edouard F. Médard
- Bit part
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jackie Raynal
- Dancer
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensione in evidenza
Film makers love to show off the Rivera, and for good reason. It's one of the most spectacular venues in the world. However, it's interesting to compare Preminger's Rivera with those of Hitchcock in "To Catch a Thief" and Powell's in "The Red Shoes". In "The Red Shoes" the Riviera is merely a setting in which artists work obsessively to create their art while paying virtually no attention to it. For Hitchcock, the Riviera is a lush background for intrigue. In Preminger's "Bonjour Tristesse" the Riviera represents the lifestyle that the characters desire; luxurious, sensual, hedonistic and, ultimately, empty. "Bonjour Tristesse" is worth seeing for the Riviera, which looks fabulous, and Jean Seberg, who looks fabulous. However, the story is as shallow as the characters.
I do not think that it would be giving away the plot to say that the viewer is led to believe from the very beginning that he is seeing a tragedy. After all, the title translates as "Hello, Sorrow". Furthermore, the opening exposition, filmed in somber black-and-white, leads one to believe that the lives of the protagonists have been devastated by some great tragedy. However, from the very beginning it is also obvious that this impression is not true at all. The father and daughter are depicted as a pair of shallow, selfish, hedonists who care nothing for anything or anyone beyond each other and their own immediate gratification.
The story does not even mention exactly what, if anything, it is that the father does for a living. He is obviously extremely wealthy, but is never seen to do any sort of work or transact any business. It was apparently sufficient for the author that he should be nothing more than a rich, idle, middle-aged playboy who changes his cars as frequently as his daughter, who never wears the same outfit twice, changes her clothes.
In short, not only are the characters in this story not real people, they are not even sympathetic unreal people. It's bad enough having to put up with an hour and a half movie about mannequins without them having to be unlikable mannequins.
I do not think that it would be giving away the plot to say that the viewer is led to believe from the very beginning that he is seeing a tragedy. After all, the title translates as "Hello, Sorrow". Furthermore, the opening exposition, filmed in somber black-and-white, leads one to believe that the lives of the protagonists have been devastated by some great tragedy. However, from the very beginning it is also obvious that this impression is not true at all. The father and daughter are depicted as a pair of shallow, selfish, hedonists who care nothing for anything or anyone beyond each other and their own immediate gratification.
The story does not even mention exactly what, if anything, it is that the father does for a living. He is obviously extremely wealthy, but is never seen to do any sort of work or transact any business. It was apparently sufficient for the author that he should be nothing more than a rich, idle, middle-aged playboy who changes his cars as frequently as his daughter, who never wears the same outfit twice, changes her clothes.
In short, not only are the characters in this story not real people, they are not even sympathetic unreal people. It's bad enough having to put up with an hour and a half movie about mannequins without them having to be unlikable mannequins.
- robertguttman
- 15 mar 2019
- Permalink
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOtto Preminger always liked this film, although he felt the American critics did not do it justice. The film was a qualified success in France, yet American critics felt the film wasn't French enough, a detail that amused Preminger.
- BlooperWe hear the Band at c.6'50" and we see a clarinet-player performing, but the music has no clarinet part whatsoever included at that point in the soundtrack. Later, when the clarinet does eventually join the soundtrack, the fingering of the player bears absolutely no relation to the music actually being heard.
- ConnessioniEdited into Histoire(s) du cinéma: Une histoire seule (1989)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 446 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 34 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Bonjour tristesse (1958) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi