You're Still Not Fooling Anybody

1997
5min

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaMike White goes after Quentin Tarantino again in this sequel of "Who Do You Think You're Fooling?". In this follow-up, Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" is the analyzed object and this time White p... Leggi tuttoMike White goes after Quentin Tarantino again in this sequel of "Who Do You Think You're Fooling?". In this follow-up, Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" is the analyzed object and this time White presents the heavily borrowed elements taken from several films (like Aldrich's "Kiss Me De... Leggi tuttoMike White goes after Quentin Tarantino again in this sequel of "Who Do You Think You're Fooling?". In this follow-up, Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" is the analyzed object and this time White presents the heavily borrowed elements taken from several films (like Aldrich's "Kiss Me Deadly" and Scorsese's "American Boy") that end up making part of Quentin's classic.

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

3,3/10

187

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

7Recensioni degli utenti

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

Foto1

Interpreti principali10

Modifica

Kurt Loder

Self
(filmato d'archivio)

Rosanna Arquette

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Samuel L. Jackson

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Steven Prince

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Ving Rhames

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Eric Stoltz

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Uma Thurman

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

John Travolta

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

John Vernon

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

Frank Whaley

Self
(filmato d'archivio)
(non citato nei titoli originali)

‘Snow White’ Stars Test Their Wits

Rachel Zegler, Gal Gadot, and director Marc Webb take our Ultimate Disney Quiz.

Watch now

9:57

Trama

Modifica

Lo sapevi?

Modifica

Connessioni
Edited from Un bacio e una pistola (1955)

Recensioni degli utenti7

Recensione in evidenza

1/10

Yep, as most sequels: Poor, very poor.........

Well, what can I say about this one.... It's some sort of sequel of the terrific 'Who Do You Think You're Fooling?' the movie that shows that Tarantino "borrowed" stuff from another movie for his debut 'Reservoir Dogs'. It was pretty obvious that QT made a nice replica of 'City on Fire' (although it was only ten minutes he borrowed from the original...)

This movie had to prove that Tarantino borrowed again from other movies for the classic movie Pulp Fiction. This time the evidence is less convincing. Showing that someone's reading Ezekiel 25:17, and say that one is stolen by Tarantino, is in my opinion very poor, because that part is a passage written in the bible !!

Hmmmm, not really convincing evidence, eh ? It goes on and on in this (only 2 minute) movie. Things were you scratch the back of your head and say:" I could collect that evidence for every movie" and yes, that's the feeling I got when I saw this one.

It seems that Mike White (the director) made this one to come back to the attention of the audience, and uses his old concept again. But like all other sequels, this one never comes close to the first movie. You really can say that Mr.White is the one who's fooling the audience this time !

I say, a poor movie that tries to tackle a classic (Pulp Fiction), but misses the target completely !! A zero out of 5 ......