VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,1/10
12.275
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un meticoloso orticoltore dedito a prendersi cura dei terreni di una bellissima tenuta e ad assecondare il suo datore di lavoro, la ricca vedova.Un meticoloso orticoltore dedito a prendersi cura dei terreni di una bellissima tenuta e ad assecondare il suo datore di lavoro, la ricca vedova.Un meticoloso orticoltore dedito a prendersi cura dei terreni di una bellissima tenuta e ad assecondare il suo datore di lavoro, la ricca vedova.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 7 candidature totali
Christian Vaughn
- John
- (as Christian Freeman)
Emily Russell
- Waitress
- (as Emily C. Russell)
Monica R. Harris
- Female Host
- (as Monica Harris)
Recensione in evidenza
I have to say, I haven't seen any of the other two movies part of this thematic trilogy, but as far as I know they're independent stories.
To start with, the story is nothing original. It's been done many times before, and better.
The story of a guy with a dark past and set of skills, retired from that life, trying to live a quiet life in a small job, but trouble comes up and the guy goes back to old habits.
I know, that's not all there is here, but the rest, honestly, didn't blow my mind neither. I just didn't connect with the characters or what they do. And it's actually weird, because I do like gardening and nature in general, but it just didn't click for me.
Also, I felt the visual aspect wasn't great. I get the pale colour palette, but still, the shots didn't catch my eye or made an impression, except for the monotony and bland character of it. I know many won't be so exigent with this aspect, but I consider it an important aspect and with so many great cinematographers in the industry, if a movie doesn't have this aspect covered, I feel frustrated and disappointed. After all, movies are a visual form of entertainment, which include other many aspects, but it's a visual thing first!
Besides all that technical criticism, I found the ending quite weird, awkward, a bit cheesy and even slightly nonsensical at some degree, considering the character Norma (S. Weaver).
On the performances side, everyone give solid acts, that's the strongest point of the movie for sure.
Quite a disappointment, I was expecting this to be a solid movie, but it ended up being a mediocre piece, for me.
To start with, the story is nothing original. It's been done many times before, and better.
The story of a guy with a dark past and set of skills, retired from that life, trying to live a quiet life in a small job, but trouble comes up and the guy goes back to old habits.
I know, that's not all there is here, but the rest, honestly, didn't blow my mind neither. I just didn't connect with the characters or what they do. And it's actually weird, because I do like gardening and nature in general, but it just didn't click for me.
Also, I felt the visual aspect wasn't great. I get the pale colour palette, but still, the shots didn't catch my eye or made an impression, except for the monotony and bland character of it. I know many won't be so exigent with this aspect, but I consider it an important aspect and with so many great cinematographers in the industry, if a movie doesn't have this aspect covered, I feel frustrated and disappointed. After all, movies are a visual form of entertainment, which include other many aspects, but it's a visual thing first!
Besides all that technical criticism, I found the ending quite weird, awkward, a bit cheesy and even slightly nonsensical at some degree, considering the character Norma (S. Weaver).
On the performances side, everyone give solid acts, that's the strongest point of the movie for sure.
Quite a disappointment, I was expecting this to be a solid movie, but it ended up being a mediocre piece, for me.
- foxtografo
- 26 mag 2023
- Permalink
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn a 2022 interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Paul Schrader spoke about how the style of the film serves to create an atmosphere of unease and unfamiliarity: "Well, there is a coldness; there's a withheld-ness - in the performance, in the production design. There's not much furniture around, and what's with those jellyfish on the wallpaper? So there's a kind of distance, which is intentional. And that little room he lives in, which makes no sense. So, yes, you're using those stylistic elements to make the viewer feel that there is a gap between what you want to feel and what you do feel. And that's a calculated gap that you create stylistically - sometimes by use of the camera, more often by not using the camera, by not giving certain things. It creates a sense of unease, that makes you feel, 'this could be a story I know very well, but somehow I'm looking at it and I don't think I know it very well at all.'
- BlooperThe pudding Narval eats at his dinner with Norma grows back into the plate when the camera angle changes, than vanishes again at the last shot from afar.
- Citazioni
Narvel Roth: Gardening is a belief in the future. A belief that things will happen according to plan.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Master Gardener?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 667.114 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 264.866 USD
- 21 mag 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 1.506.008 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti