VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
4874
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAn office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.An office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.An office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.
Frankie J. Allison
- Barney the Security Guard
- (as Frankie Jay Allison)
Alejandro Patiño
- Fernando the Janitor
- (as Alejandro Patino)
Julie Elizabeth Abeyta
- Businesswoman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Michael Raif Brizzolara
- Witness to John Ferguson's Suicide
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Christian Ijin Link
- Businessman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensione in evidenza
The plot: On the day that he is fired, an idealistic paralegal witnesses a professional killer murder one of his former coworkers at a legal firm.
I guess the setup isn't too original, but that's fine with me. I'm always up for a thriller in which a witness is hunted down by a hit-man. The plot is vaguely topical, and it should appeal to those who rail against "big pharma". The setting is law firm engaged in legal action against a giant pharmaceutical company, and there is occasional commentary about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
There are a number of minor problems with the film, but I don't think any of them make it unwatchable. If you're more interested in entertainment value than originality, and you're forgiving of plot holes, I think you could do worse than this. The ending has received a bit of criticism here, but I thought it was perfectly fine. However, if you're the kind of person who wants every single plot element fully resolved, I can see how that would annoy you.
There isn't any gore, nudity, or excessively harsh language, and the violence is fairly restrained. There isn't really all that much atmosphere, but Mindhella and Feild do a decent job. For a direct-to-video thriller, I'd say it's about what you might be expecting: flawed but watchable, unoriginal but entertaining.
I guess the setup isn't too original, but that's fine with me. I'm always up for a thriller in which a witness is hunted down by a hit-man. The plot is vaguely topical, and it should appeal to those who rail against "big pharma". The setting is law firm engaged in legal action against a giant pharmaceutical company, and there is occasional commentary about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
There are a number of minor problems with the film, but I don't think any of them make it unwatchable. If you're more interested in entertainment value than originality, and you're forgiving of plot holes, I think you could do worse than this. The ending has received a bit of criticism here, but I thought it was perfectly fine. However, if you're the kind of person who wants every single plot element fully resolved, I can see how that would annoy you.
There isn't any gore, nudity, or excessively harsh language, and the violence is fairly restrained. There isn't really all that much atmosphere, but Mindhella and Feild do a decent job. For a direct-to-video thriller, I'd say it's about what you might be expecting: flawed but watchable, unoriginal but entertaining.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie was originally supposed to be released in 2012.
- BlooperTom is unable to call 911 due to phone lock; however every phone has an option to dial 911 even if the phone is locked.
- Citazioni
Thomas Miller: Gotcha!
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Not Safe for Work?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Not Safe for Work
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Stati Uniti(usa)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 14 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Senza uscita (2014) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi