Dez anos se passaram, e Sidney Prescott, que se reergueu graças, em parte, a sua escrita, é visitada pelo assassino Ghostface.Dez anos se passaram, e Sidney Prescott, que se reergueu graças, em parte, a sua escrita, é visitada pelo assassino Ghostface.Dez anos se passaram, e Sidney Prescott, que se reergueu graças, em parte, a sua escrita, é visitada pelo assassino Ghostface.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 6 indicações no total
Roger Jackson
- The Voice
- (narração)
Shenae Grimes-Beech
- Trudie
- (as Shenae Grimes)
Britt Robertson
- Marnie Cooper
- (as Brittany Robertson)
Avaliação em destaque
I'm 23 years old. 12 years ago, I watched the original "Scream" (1996) and it was the first horror movie I enjoyed. It was a landmark in the puberty years of many movie-buffs-to-be who grew up in the late 1990's (good times!). SCREAM 2 & 3 were released in 1997 and 2000, respectively, and although entertaining, didn't hold a candle to the original (which is fine, most sequels don't). "Scream 3", in particular, lacked Kevin Williamson behind the script, and not even Wes Craven could turn what Ehren Kruger wrote into gold (meaning, a good flick; it did make a lot of money, though, and Parker Posey made it hilarious at moments).
So, eleven years later, a new SCREAM movie comes out, reuniting the original director, writer and the three survivors of the franchise, heroine Sidney Prescott (my first movie crush, Neve Campbell, still naturally beautiful and always a competent actress), Dewey (David Arquette) and Gale (Courteney Cox). Die hard fans, like me, have been waiting for this for a decade, and it paid off. Actually, it works so well because it was made 11 years after the last installment. The movie is far from perfect, obviously, but stands as the best of the sequels; "Scream 2" was above the average but came way too soon, and the third one was a wasted opportunity.
The tongue-in-cheek humor works for the most part, and Williamson knows how to parody a trend that he (re)created himself, including the ridiculousness of torture porn from the likes of SAW and its annual sequels - "movies with no character development, in which you don't care who lives or dies". That is the strongest link in this franchise: we've come to care about Sidney, Dewey and Gale, making the SCREAM movies work equally as slashers and satires. Whether or not SCREAM 5 & 6 will be made, it all depends on how much money this will make; I'm satisfied with this 4th chapter, although I won't deny I will still see another one if Craven, Williamson, and Campbell are involved. That said, it was a nostalgic flick that made me feel like I'm a preteen again. It may be a "new generation with new rules", but the iPhone generation oughtta know: "The first rule of remakes: you don't f*** with the original". Bravo, Sidney!
So, eleven years later, a new SCREAM movie comes out, reuniting the original director, writer and the three survivors of the franchise, heroine Sidney Prescott (my first movie crush, Neve Campbell, still naturally beautiful and always a competent actress), Dewey (David Arquette) and Gale (Courteney Cox). Die hard fans, like me, have been waiting for this for a decade, and it paid off. Actually, it works so well because it was made 11 years after the last installment. The movie is far from perfect, obviously, but stands as the best of the sequels; "Scream 2" was above the average but came way too soon, and the third one was a wasted opportunity.
The tongue-in-cheek humor works for the most part, and Williamson knows how to parody a trend that he (re)created himself, including the ridiculousness of torture porn from the likes of SAW and its annual sequels - "movies with no character development, in which you don't care who lives or dies". That is the strongest link in this franchise: we've come to care about Sidney, Dewey and Gale, making the SCREAM movies work equally as slashers and satires. Whether or not SCREAM 5 & 6 will be made, it all depends on how much money this will make; I'm satisfied with this 4th chapter, although I won't deny I will still see another one if Craven, Williamson, and Campbell are involved. That said, it was a nostalgic flick that made me feel like I'm a preteen again. It may be a "new generation with new rules", but the iPhone generation oughtta know: "The first rule of remakes: you don't f*** with the original". Bravo, Sidney!
- Benedict_Cumberbatch
- 14 de abr. de 2011
- Link permanente
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLast film directed by Wes Craven before he died from brain cancer on August 30, 2015, at the age of seventy-six.
- Erros de gravação(at around 36 mins) When Sidney runs to Olivia's house she walks into the blood splattered room. Sidney runs her hand down the blood covered door frame. None of the blood smudges or goes onto her hand. If the murder had just happened the blood would have went onto her hand, and smeared down the door frame.
- Citações
Sidney Prescott: You forgot the first rule of remakes, Jill. Don't fuck with the original!
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosWhen the end credits start, there are 2-second long clips of the characters with the actor's name corresponding.
- Versões alternativasThe UK version contains re-dubbed/additional dialogue compared to the US version. Both cuts are identical in terms of visual content, but there are approximately 30 aural differences between the two.
- ConexõesFeatured in Scream Awards 2010 (2010)
- Trilhas sonorasSomething To Die For
Written by Jesper Anderberg, Felix Rodriguez, Fredrik Blond, Maja Ivarsson, Johan Bengtsson
Performed by The Sounds
Courtesy of Arnioki Records
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 40.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 38.180.928
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 18.692.090
- 17 de abr. de 2011
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 97.231.420
- Tempo de duração1 hora 51 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente