This documentary examines the authenticity of the photographic record of NASA's Apollo missions.This documentary examines the authenticity of the photographic record of NASA's Apollo missions.This documentary examines the authenticity of the photographic record of NASA's Apollo missions.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
It makes very interesting questions about the moon landing, ones that go further than "no stars in the sky" or "visible cables". I have yet to find feasible counter arguments to the claims made here, but at a first look it's arguments are very, very compelling.
Massimo Mazzucho has created a very thorough documentary describing the challenges of the monumentary task of sending man to the moon and back in the 1960s. Its told in a very entertaining and made in a professional way. He lets the people debunking the myth of a fake moon landing utter their words, before he shows how it cannot be possible - with the usage of original NASA films and pictures.
Anyone in doubt should see this film - it'll probably lay your doubts to rest. And dont just take Massimos words for it - Highly esteemed photographers who were used to use the same cameras and film that NASA used share their experience and wisdom also give their opinion in the NASA pictures.
All in all, yet another great documentary from Massimo Mazuccho - well worth my money and time. Its a 10 out of 10.
Anyone in doubt should see this film - it'll probably lay your doubts to rest. And dont just take Massimos words for it - Highly esteemed photographers who were used to use the same cameras and film that NASA used share their experience and wisdom also give their opinion in the NASA pictures.
All in all, yet another great documentary from Massimo Mazuccho - well worth my money and time. Its a 10 out of 10.
After having seen a few videos about the "moon conspiracy" and their dumb arguments about UFOs and other nonsense, I certainly didn't want to waste time and money on yet another "documentary" on this old subject.
So I waited until it was publicly available for free and I started to watch it due to some friends insisting so much.
And boy, it took me off guard: I could not stop and I had to watch all of it, until the end (and it's long!).
It's an extremely well done movie, where finally someone is able to present facts and competing theories with balance, and ending each chapter with a question instead of dumb proclaims.
I look forward to hearing the replies to those 42 questions, because I think that for a few of them it will be very, very hard.
So I waited until it was publicly available for free and I started to watch it due to some friends insisting so much.
And boy, it took me off guard: I could not stop and I had to watch all of it, until the end (and it's long!).
It's an extremely well done movie, where finally someone is able to present facts and competing theories with balance, and ending each chapter with a question instead of dumb proclaims.
I look forward to hearing the replies to those 42 questions, because I think that for a few of them it will be very, very hard.
10R_Hak
I never had thought I would be on the "side" or "conspiracy theorists", considering my biomedical background, yet here I am, writing a very positive review on this documentary.
I now realise that the general public believes what they believe only because they never heard a differing argument, which would point out the inconsistency of the official narrative.
This is a long documentary, but NEVER boring, at least for those who want unapologetic truth.
The doc. Starts with an historical perspective, which is fairly important, then presents some pro moon-landing arguments, and then starts to dismantle them one by one. It also tries to clean the debate table of the bad arguments or better to call them false (flag! :) ) arguments, which I guess are also pushed forward by gov puppets in order to discredit the differing pov.
Anyhow, the most interesting part for me was the photographic evidence. I was in disbelief. The shadow thing, in itself, would have been enough for any sane and rational person to doubt and totally reject the official narrative.
You should watch this!
I now realise that the general public believes what they believe only because they never heard a differing argument, which would point out the inconsistency of the official narrative.
This is a long documentary, but NEVER boring, at least for those who want unapologetic truth.
The doc. Starts with an historical perspective, which is fairly important, then presents some pro moon-landing arguments, and then starts to dismantle them one by one. It also tries to clean the debate table of the bad arguments or better to call them false (flag! :) ) arguments, which I guess are also pushed forward by gov puppets in order to discredit the differing pov.
Anyhow, the most interesting part for me was the photographic evidence. I was in disbelief. The shadow thing, in itself, would have been enough for any sane and rational person to doubt and totally reject the official narrative.
You should watch this!
The documentary lays out every aspect about what is wrong with the official story about the moonlanding. There is no dramatic music or strange mysteries, so you don't feel manipulated as a viewer. You feel the documentary approaches the subject objectively. It is firstly about how the apollo project didn't go as well as expected, then how it was very hard to get humans to the moon and lastly how the footage on the moon is extremely problematic. Throughout this documentary there are several debunkings of the moon conspiracy theory that the documentary explains are actually false or unlikely.
If the moonlanding was faked, then there are dozens of questions that pop up into your head. This documentary goes into all of them and that's why it's 3,5 hours.
Did you know
- Quotes
Peter Lindbergh: These pictures are fake. I would say I'm 100% sure.
- ConnectionsFeatures A Trip to the Moon (1902)
- How long is American Moon?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime3 hours 34 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content