The Candyman arrives in New Orleans and sets his sights on a young woman whose family was ruined by the immortal killer years before.The Candyman arrives in New Orleans and sets his sights on a young woman whose family was ruined by the immortal killer years before.The Candyman arrives in New Orleans and sets his sights on a young woman whose family was ruined by the immortal killer years before.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Russell Buchanan
- Kingfisher
- (voice)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured review
I think the original Candyman is a very good horror film and builds upon the mythos of such urban legends as "Bloody Mary" and so on and so forth. It didn't feature the best acting in the world but it was suitable and the atmosphere was very scary.
The sequel, "Candyman II: Farewell to the Flesh," is as most horror sequels typically are -- inferior and less scary. It's like "Halloween II," "Friday the 13th Part II" and "Psycho II": not as good as the original! Yet for what it is, "Candyman II" is quite entertaining, and still manages to remain rather atmospheric. The film takes place in New Orleans around the Mardi Gras and it's got some good scary segments. Some aren't so scary but are fun to watch. We know what's going to happen but it's still entertaining.
No this isn't expertly made but it isn't mind-numbingly bad as some of the genre are. Basically it's loads of blood but it also retains its creepy cinematography and the direction is better than expected.
Overall this kept me entertained, which is all I expected in the first place.
The sequel, "Candyman II: Farewell to the Flesh," is as most horror sequels typically are -- inferior and less scary. It's like "Halloween II," "Friday the 13th Part II" and "Psycho II": not as good as the original! Yet for what it is, "Candyman II" is quite entertaining, and still manages to remain rather atmospheric. The film takes place in New Orleans around the Mardi Gras and it's got some good scary segments. Some aren't so scary but are fun to watch. We know what's going to happen but it's still entertaining.
No this isn't expertly made but it isn't mind-numbingly bad as some of the genre are. Basically it's loads of blood but it also retains its creepy cinematography and the direction is better than expected.
Overall this kept me entertained, which is all I expected in the first place.
- MovieAddict2016
- Jun 17, 2005
- Permalink
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaBernard Rose originally conceived a sequel to his 1992 hit Candyman (1992) as not featuring the eponymous character at all but instead continuing to explore the nature of urban horror myths. This was quickly scotched when the producers figured that audiences would show up because they wanted to see Candyman eviscerate his victims.
- GoofsAs Annie's brother falls down the steps, he is obviously replaced by a stuntman with long hair.
- How long is Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Candyman 2: Farewell to the Flesh
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $6,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $13,940,383
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $6,046,825
- Mar 19, 1995
- Gross worldwide
- $13,941,216
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh (1995) officially released in India in Hindi?
Answer