User reviews

How can you rate this movie a 10/10? It's not even close to being Saving Private Ryan, Schindlers List, A Beautiful Life, Shawnshank Redemption, Gladiator, etc. Those movies aren't even rated 10/10. The acting and storyline was mediocre at best. After seeing this in theatres I thought it was a waste of money and should've just been released to Netflix directly. Don't get me wrong I'm a fan of Mel Gibson, Topher Grace, and Mark Wahlberg. Felt like it was a low budget movie. There were areas that were entertaining. However, I felt like this movie was lacking depth. Do yourself a favor and wait to watch this movie whenever it comes out on your favorite streaming service.

I wasn't even going to go see this film after seeing the preview. It just looked so standard in the ad, and I felt it gave away too much of the story. Then I noticed it was directed by Mel. So, I thought why not, I've seen everything else he's directed. So I used my points to go see it, and I must say. I think it definitely is a little better than how it comes across in the ad. The filmmaking is definitely solid. The film creates some fairly tense moments, even though it's one of those films where you sort of have an idea as to how it will likely end. It is a fairly straightforward and simple film for sure. However it is well made, and the script is definitely not as unintelligently written as most Hollywood films these days. The dialogue is perhaps a little harsh for some, but that actually also helps this film build the decent amount of tension that it needs to work reasonably well. I definitely don't regret going to see it on the big screen. For many people, this will be worth a watch for sure.

I think Mel may have taken this project in order to help fund his own passion projects, and why not? They definitely made a decent little film out of this in my view. In fact, I'd say it's a fairly good date movie if you all can handle some creepy dialogue and a little bit of gore.

What is also refreshing about this script, is that even though a female has a major role in the film. The script doesn't enter into any of these overly naive and ridiculous political narratives that so many other Hollywood films these days do. If I see another one of those films, I'm going to be sick right in the theatre. So look out people.

6.5/10.

A complete disaster. Based on the trailers shown in cinemas, you'd think this movie had potential-something intriguing to offer. But here's the harsh reality: it's an absolute mess. The ideas are disjointed, fragmented, and utterly incoherent, as if the script was scribbled during a caffeine-fueled ADHD episode.

The so-called "humorous" start quickly falls flat, revealing a lack of substance or cohesion. The storyline goes nowhere, and the characters are as forgettable as the dialogue. To make matters worse, the cinematography is mediocre at best-uninspired shots, poor framing, and nothing visually striking to salvage the train wreck.

It's not just disappointing-it's insulting to the audience's intelligence. Save yourself the time and money, because this film is an exercise in frustration, not entertainment.

Flight Risk is Mel Gibson's latest film (a thriller/action piece) and stars Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Dockery, and Topher Grace. It made my list of most anticipated for the year, and much like my experience with Wolf Man, I enjoyed this film for what it was. Simple plot, decent acting and action, and not anything that wears out its welcome. While there are some nitpicks I had about various moments that didn't feel quite so solid, the film as a whole was enjoyable enough that I wasn't pissed or disappointed. As I've mentioned before, I consider that a win these days. Video review is on my YouTube channel.

With the boss of the "Moretti" crime family about to go on trial, his accountant "Winston" (Topher Grace) thought it better to skedaddle to the Alaskan wilderness. Unluckily for him, determined deputy marshal "Madolyn" (Michelle Dockery) tracks him down and engages the pilot of a single-prop aircraft to fly him back to New York to turn state's evidence. The pilot (Mark Wahlberg) is one of those annoyingly chirpy guys and off they set. It's gonna be a bumpy ride, but after she notices a few scars on this man, it proves to be a great deal bumpier as their tiny little cockpit becomes the scene for quite a power struggle. It's that claustrophobic environment and quite an engaging effort from Wahlberg that deliver here as this airborne game of cat and mouse hots up. Sure, it does repeat itself once too often and the story is really all quite predictably weak, but the scenario does work well enough and with Grace's wise-cracking and a competent performance from Dockery it's actually not a bad watch for ninety minutes.

I've enjoyed some of Mel Gibson's movies, but this is truly the worst film I've seen in the last decade.

The script could have been generated by artificial intelligence, and the same goes for the visual effects. The script is a complete mess, and the characters are completely two dimensionally written, which is a surprise as there's basically only three characters in the film - the twisted baddie pilot (Mark Wahlberg, dreadful), the irritating nerd (Topher Grace - appalling), and the plucky Air Marshall (Michelle Dockery - what was she thinking).

The entire thing is laughable. A single propellor plane nosedives towards the snowy mountains, and smashes into the snow, but somehow, erm, flies through and keeps going the other side. The conceit that they are "stuck in the freezing wilderness inside a small plane" is discovered half-way through to be solvable because... oh the air Marshall had an iPhone with satellite connectivity that she forgot about? That works with crystal-clear communication every time.

Truly terrible film-making. Avoid at all costs.

Mel Gibson is a great filmmaker. I think what people must not be understanding here is that whilst all of his previous directorial outings have been deep and heavy for want of a better description, he has stated that he made Flight Risk as pure popcorn entertainment. That is exactly what he has done, and what fun it is.

Wahlberg has a blast with a wonderfully over the top sadistic and bald performance, Topher Grace provides good comic timing, but Michelle Dockery carries the film and actually gives it some heart. Her performance is far better than a film like this would ordinarily demand. It's shot well, with the tension and pacing being spot on.

I think it shows Gibson's versatility as a director. A short and taut thriller made in just 22 days.

It does nothing new and it is was it says on the tin.......a really fun popcorn flick.

I enjoyed everything about this movie and the tension was well maintained, right to the very end.

It may have been confusing in some parts but I later realised that it created frantic scenarios in a tiny plane space which I feel was masterfully done.

I had no expectation and knew nothing about the story line and watched it for what it is - very entertaining, a great thriller with a good pace.

I had no idea it was directed by Mel Gibson - I think he did a great job. We need more stories like this, quick to the point and honest about what it is without unnecessary details that hinder the tension. Every time you start to feel at ease and think things are finally in control something will happen to unsettle you.

Flight Risk, is a film that had the potential to be a gripping thriller but ultimately falls flat due to a combination of poor storytelling, lackluster performances, and a general sense of predictability. Despite the star power behind it, the movie fails to deliver on its promise of high-stakes tension and instead becomes a forgettable entry in the action-thriller genre.

One of the most glaring issues with it, is its uninspired and formulaic plot. The story revolves around a pilot (played by Wahlberg) who becomes embroiled in a dangerous situation while transporting a fugitive. While this premise could have been the foundation for a tense and engaging narrative, the execution is disappointingly bland. The plot unfolds in a predictable manner, with few surprises or twists to keep the audience engaged. The stakes never feel particularly high, and the resolution is both rushed and unsatisfying, leaving viewers with a sense of anticlimax.

Mark Wahlberg, who has proven his acting chops in other films, seems to be on autopilot here. His performance lacks the depth and intensity needed to make his character compelling. Instead, he comes across as one-dimensional, with little emotional range or development throughout the film. The supporting cast doesn't fare much better, with most characters feeling underdeveloped and serving as little more than plot devices. The lack of strong character arcs or meaningful interactions further detracts from the film's overall impact.

The direction by Mel Gibson is another weak point. Known for his work in front of and behind the camera, Gibson's efforts here feel uninspired and lack the visceral energy that has characterized some of his previous projects. The pacing is uneven, with long stretches of tedium punctuated by brief moments of action that fail to generate any real excitement. The film's attempts at building suspense often fall flat, as the tension is undermined by predictable plot developments and a lack of genuine stakes.

The screenplay is equally problematic, plagued by clichéd dialogue and a lack of originality. The characters frequently spout lines that feel forced and unnatural, making it difficult for the audience to connect with them or become invested in their fates. The film also struggles to balance its tone, veering awkwardly between moments of attempted seriousness and unintentional humor. This tonal inconsistency further detracts from the overall experience, making it hard to take the film seriously.

Visually, Flight Risk is equally unremarkable. The cinematography lacks creativity, with few memorable shots or sequences that stand out. The action scenes, which should be the film's highlight, are poorly choreographed and lack the intensity needed to leave a lasting impression. The special effects are serviceable but nothing more, failing to elevate the film or add any sense of spectacle.

It's not a high concept movie by any stretch. But, it is an entertaining flick. And, it's the first time Wahlberg has played an actual bad guy since 1996's Fear. And not to give anything away, but damn, his character gets taken to task to say the least.

Topher Grace is...Topher Grace in this movie. His character really could've been played by any number of actors. The same could be said for the actress who played the FBI agent. But in reality, none of the characters actually required in depth character study or to be standout. It was just a matter of getting actors to sign onto the film who could competently pull off the scenes.

So again, it's a decent film overall. I don't think anyone will walk out feeling disappointed or angry about spending their time or money watching it. And as run of the mill as it is, it's still better than what's being nominated for an Academy award this year.

LIKES: Funny Dialogue Acting That Goes With Comedy A Decent Character Story Good Visuals In The Limited Setting Some Clever Maneuvers Good Pace A Blend of Thriller And Comedy Summary: If you have seen the trailers, you know the movie's plot sounds a bit farfetched, and you would be right on the money with that assumption. Flight Risk is a movie that is meant to be something serious but turns out to be a silly ordeal intertwined with those elements. Our cast is essentially three actors trying to make a tale with some heart, suspense, and a good drive toward the fate of an accomplice for the local crime lord. On some levels, the movie accomplishes this better than I had expected, given the absurdity of the plot. It's a movie with better character development, with two of the characters going deeper and connecting far past the initial expectations of the opening scene.

The performances are not the best executed, but they are fun and believable at times as they handle the very shaky script that is not to be taken seriously from what I saw with the movie. Dockery is the most serious of the bunch and accomplishes the Crime/Thriller role the best with the focus, seriousness, and agent-like composure she wields professionally, but she also has moments of vulnerability that are authentic and well-written. Grace starts out like another knock-off to That 70's show but then evolves into more as the flight continues to hit turbulence and the fight for survival begins. Despite the serious attempts, though, the movie is drowned out in comedy, to which Wahlberg excels with his corny delivery, odd energy, and that slightly laughable grin he has made his trademark brand.

I laughed a lot at this film because of the dialogue and clever bits of humor mixed in; the stretches were balanced enough to make things fun without being too annoying. Once the thrills started, the laughs continued as well from the crazy things they had the plane go through, the actions very unrealistic to the level that it's so bad, it's ironically good. The thrills keep coming, the pace exciting with it, and the story laid out to take the right breaks to expand upon the characters. It's a nice blend and provides much more to the entertainment aspects that impressed me with just how fun it was to see it all come together. Throw in a good set of visuals to make the effects look realistic and you've accomplished yet another fun aspect of the movie to help distract from the ludicrous project Flight Risk is.

DISLIKES: Cheesy Wahlberg's Character Is Eh A Bit Too Comedy Better Story/Twist Execution Summary: The movie is cheesy, and you have to be ready to suspend that disbelief to levels that might be annoying to some fans. All the positive things mentioned above help this, but there are still moments that stretch things too much for me to ignore. The comedy does get a bit overbearing at times, feeling like a sitcom in how forced and frequent the jokes are without the full delivery and timing to build it up. Those moments do get a tad stale for me and might be the same for those with a low tolerance for more comedy and less story. The tale has its ups and downs, but I felt it needed a better execution of the story and the "twists" that lie with it. Flight Risk needed to be in something other than a plane or have a story taking place during it, like Speed did, to help add more dynamic telling and give us something more than a conveniently designed plane. This is done via the radio, but it still felt strained, with eye-rolling moments that were just too much to believe and swallow down. Throw in the lame use of Wahlberg's character for comedic relief and a visual antagonist, and the story takes further hits from the expectations placed by the trailers. More character development, psychological warfare, and storytelling with him were the biggest things I wanted from this movie for improvement, especially given how well Wahlberg can make a character shine if given the material. It is another case of too much compacted into one setting, and even though the thrills hit at times, they just can't match some better thrillers I've seen in the past.

The VERDICT: Flight Risk meets many expectations in what the trailers laid out. It's a cheesy movie, full of contrived moments and disbelief to help add artificial thrills to the movie and try to get that entertaining Friday Flick that they love so well. A strong acting game makes the material more fun, with comedic delivery and banter being the primary meat in this sandwich to munch on, with a few vulnerable moments to act as an appetizer. The thrills are enjoyable despite the unrealistic moments, but there was more that could have come together to unleash the full potential of the movie and address the story limitations that a single plane location provides. Still, this pace, the visual effects, and the fun that I had with this movie make it a suitable one to hit the theater to watch and kill some time. My scores for the movie are:

Action/Crime/Drama/thriller: 6.5-7.0 Movie Overall: 6.5.

This is a fine movie. People are rating it like it's some Oscar nomination high concept film and the thriller it claims to be.

Comparing is to old movies that is stupid. Today's viewer doesn't care about your nostalgia and how it compares.

There is nothing technically wrong with this movie on its own. Sure it's stretches reality, but that's what movies do and have done since the very first.

I've watch a lot of movies, a lot. I know what a sub five star movie is, this isn't. Get a grip people.

The storyline is easy to follow, it doesn't have random plot holes. It's actually very formulaic which isn't a bad thing and anyone who claims different likely watches season 8 of an endless cop drama / hospital drama / hero drama nonsense without the same critique.

'Flight Risk' is a film that I'm not totally convinced by, though in the end I think I like it. On the one hand, it has inconsistent suspense, has dodgy humour and doesn't truly entertain like an action thriller ought to. On the other hand, the performances are good, the exterior plane shots are convincing and the twisty nature makes it watchable.

Mark Wahlberg (amusing accent), Michelle Dockery and Topher Grace are actors that I enjoyed watching here, Grace manages to overcome some cringey dialogue that was (hopefully, for his sake) written for him; the banter isn't great, the more serious stuff he is solid at. Monib Abhat also has iffy comedy, though does make it work more; a mostly voice role helps.

Overall, a fine time at the movies. Like last week, I was fortunately able to watch it as part of a double header on the big screen - this time with Steven Soderbergh's 'Presence'. Back-to-back 90 minutes, I'm cool with long run times but sometimes its nice to have films of such a length. For what it's worth, that other flick is the better.

We went to see flight risk with a group of friends and we all thoroughly enjoyed it. The film was very entertaining and far from disappointing as some reviews described it. You'd think they were commenting on a totally different film, they're views are far removed from the truth.

I was surprised to see the poor reviews when I rated the film a 7 on my return home, they were verging on being ridiculous so I'd ignore them,go and see it and you'll have a great evening.

The actors performances were all strong and the plot was good with a few twists and plenty of excitement bespite what some people have written about it.

We were pleasantly surprised to see the film was both directed and produced by Mel Gibson. He made a great job of it.

I went in with low expectations as Wahlberg really hasn't done anything half decent in recent times and even with my glass half empty, I was still disappointed. I left half way through because it was that bad. A very weak script, overacted by the lead, with 2 wooden unbelievable character B listers tagging along for the ride, which was neither tense or exciting. If you are the type of film buff that has to watch every movie then please don't waste your money now, wait til it arrives on sky... just make sure you watch it in bed cos you won't need the cocoa. Have to say though, I agree with other reviewers that Wahlberg's bald head was riveting, definitely the best bit of acting in the whole movie.

Wow. This might be the worst movie I have seen at the cinema for a long long time. I really can't understand how it got passed as a theatrical release. Straight to TV at best, if it should've been made at all!

I won't give the plot away in case anyone reading this is into wasting 90 minutes of their lives but suffice it to say even Mark Wahlberg can't save this one. And on that note...I can't even see the point in Wahlberg's character. The witness/prisoner was worthy of a smack in the mouth most the way through the film, absolutely not funny and irritating as hell until the final scenes when his predicament actually makes him a semi-likeable character.

This film is full of a lot of "whys" for me. "Why didn't you just shoot him?" "Why is the pilot on the airwaves immediately on the pull?" "Why is Mark Wahlberg sporting a rascal fake bald head??" "Why is the aircraft still flying after plummeting through thick mountain top snow?" "Why did Mel Gibson bother??" I could go on...