638 reviews
With a title that doesn't seem to have anything to do with the movie itself, "Movie 43" is essentially a bunch of individual comedy sketches that are not so much offensively vulgar (as promised) as they are offensively unfunny; and sloppily put together at that. Directed by a slew of different directors (but mostly by Peter Ferrely) and starring Kate Winslet, Liev Schreiber, Anna Faris, Naomi Watts, Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry and the list goes on (but you've surely seen the trailers by now) "Movie 43" is the newest movie hoping to push the boundaries of the raunchy American comedy. So, does it succeed? My consensus has to be
ehhhhhhh.
Yes, this is all very sophomoric, but that's not to say that there are not laughs to be found. In saying that, while I don't share quite the same loathsome regard for this film as many of my fellow critics do, those who come out of "Movie 43" proclaiming it a laugh riot, are probably the same people who classify Adam Sandler as a comedian or amuse themselves by watching syndicated episodes of America's Funniest Home Videos. Even with its star power and the potential comedic material each sketch promises, "Movie 43" isn't really a film worth watching. In fact, I will go so far as to make the early prediction that this is one film which seems destined to make it onto more than a few peoples "worst of 2013" lists.
Aside from the first two sketches (which are admittedly pretty damn funny) a final sketch which works primarily because of Terrance Howard (the African American basketball skit from the trailer) and a post final credit segment concerning a woman played by Elizabeth Banks, who is jealous of her boyfriend's pet cat (animated cat) that is somewhat funny, "Movie 43" is simply not nearly as funny as it promotes itself to be. In fact, about an hour and fifteen minutes of this movie is so unfunny, that it rivals anything seen in the "Scary Movie" franchise. And to top it all off, it's not like I haven't seen comedies which are more vulgar than this; and done better. So even to say that one should see "Movie 43" because it is the most vulgar movie of all time is in fact a misnomer; but one which will undoubtedly result in garnering more ticket sales.
Side Note: This is the type of sketch comedy movie that seems as if the actors had more fun making it than anybody could have watching it. So, no doubt there will be many critical reviews comparing this film to a bad episode of Saturday Night Live, in a tired attempt at comedy. But creating comedic parallels between "Movie 43" and SNL may be a misconception, when sadly most of this film is motivated by uninventive poo poo and pee pee jokes, more so the likes of the defunked MADTV, than any other sketch comedy show.
Final Thought: Even though it's the cocktail of wishful thinking that maybe the next bit is going to be better than the last boring bit, or the morbid curiosity that comes from wanting to see who will be the next big name actor/actress to make an appearance that does give this film it's momentum, "Movie 43" is severely hindered by the fact that it contains a runtime longer than 15 minutes. So, here's my advice: The first sketch in this movie centers around a woman played by Kate Winslet going out on a blind date, only to discover that it is with a man played by Hugh Jackman. Delighted by her good fortune, she prepares to accompany him for dinner. But when Jackman takes off his scarf, it is discovered that he has been hiding a mortifyingly hilarious secret. Now, I have just outlined the funniest sketch of the entire film. So, if you sit through this one, and don't laugh once, what I want you to do is, get up, make your way to the theater's box office and ask for your money back, because for you, it will only get worse from here.
Written by Markus Robinson, Edited by Nicole I. Ashland Follow me on Twitter @moviesmarkus
Yes, this is all very sophomoric, but that's not to say that there are not laughs to be found. In saying that, while I don't share quite the same loathsome regard for this film as many of my fellow critics do, those who come out of "Movie 43" proclaiming it a laugh riot, are probably the same people who classify Adam Sandler as a comedian or amuse themselves by watching syndicated episodes of America's Funniest Home Videos. Even with its star power and the potential comedic material each sketch promises, "Movie 43" isn't really a film worth watching. In fact, I will go so far as to make the early prediction that this is one film which seems destined to make it onto more than a few peoples "worst of 2013" lists.
Aside from the first two sketches (which are admittedly pretty damn funny) a final sketch which works primarily because of Terrance Howard (the African American basketball skit from the trailer) and a post final credit segment concerning a woman played by Elizabeth Banks, who is jealous of her boyfriend's pet cat (animated cat) that is somewhat funny, "Movie 43" is simply not nearly as funny as it promotes itself to be. In fact, about an hour and fifteen minutes of this movie is so unfunny, that it rivals anything seen in the "Scary Movie" franchise. And to top it all off, it's not like I haven't seen comedies which are more vulgar than this; and done better. So even to say that one should see "Movie 43" because it is the most vulgar movie of all time is in fact a misnomer; but one which will undoubtedly result in garnering more ticket sales.
Side Note: This is the type of sketch comedy movie that seems as if the actors had more fun making it than anybody could have watching it. So, no doubt there will be many critical reviews comparing this film to a bad episode of Saturday Night Live, in a tired attempt at comedy. But creating comedic parallels between "Movie 43" and SNL may be a misconception, when sadly most of this film is motivated by uninventive poo poo and pee pee jokes, more so the likes of the defunked MADTV, than any other sketch comedy show.
Final Thought: Even though it's the cocktail of wishful thinking that maybe the next bit is going to be better than the last boring bit, or the morbid curiosity that comes from wanting to see who will be the next big name actor/actress to make an appearance that does give this film it's momentum, "Movie 43" is severely hindered by the fact that it contains a runtime longer than 15 minutes. So, here's my advice: The first sketch in this movie centers around a woman played by Kate Winslet going out on a blind date, only to discover that it is with a man played by Hugh Jackman. Delighted by her good fortune, she prepares to accompany him for dinner. But when Jackman takes off his scarf, it is discovered that he has been hiding a mortifyingly hilarious secret. Now, I have just outlined the funniest sketch of the entire film. So, if you sit through this one, and don't laugh once, what I want you to do is, get up, make your way to the theater's box office and ask for your money back, because for you, it will only get worse from here.
Written by Markus Robinson, Edited by Nicole I. Ashland Follow me on Twitter @moviesmarkus
- ghost_dog86
- Jan 25, 2013
- Permalink
After finding this "world's worst movie" for a fiver, I expected to turn it off after 10 minutes max. But I ended up watching the whole thing and was actually quite entertained most of the time.
It's a series of short sketches tied together by a pitch meeting that goes "a bit" awry. The humor is definitely not for everyone, with plenty of toilet humor, absurdities, and the kind of stuff we probably remember best from Monty Python, Madrilen, and the like. It's amusing that they managed to get some very well-known names involved in the joke.
It's not a masterpiece, absolutely not, but there are laughs along the way, small smiles, and it's actually quite funny without being super amazing, yet also miles away from "the world's worst movie." I can certainly name so-called A-movies from both 2024 and 2023 that are significantly worse.
It's a series of short sketches tied together by a pitch meeting that goes "a bit" awry. The humor is definitely not for everyone, with plenty of toilet humor, absurdities, and the kind of stuff we probably remember best from Monty Python, Madrilen, and the like. It's amusing that they managed to get some very well-known names involved in the joke.
It's not a masterpiece, absolutely not, but there are laughs along the way, small smiles, and it's actually quite funny without being super amazing, yet also miles away from "the world's worst movie." I can certainly name so-called A-movies from both 2024 and 2023 that are significantly worse.
- kim-215-306612
- Aug 24, 2024
- Permalink
- StevePulaski
- Jan 25, 2013
- Permalink
I have to be honest- I walked into this movie with pretty low expectations to begin with. It is only on a rare occasion anymore that I actually buy a ticket for a movie with any hope that it might actually provide entertainment, which is a shame. This movie, however, just lowered the bar- by a LOT. Hands down one of the worst movies that I've ever seen- and that's saying something. It is just a gaggle of actors working on an acid-trip of a script. Every bit of comedy is based on shock value, which wears thin on your patience very early on. It's gross, lewd, and utterly lacking of any wit or connection with the audience. I cannot, in good conscience, recommend this to anyone- as I nearly went up to the box office and demanded a refund. It isn't even that I'm a prude or hate gross-out humor, I'm 18 for crying out loud- I just have the ability to recognize when someone put actual effort and thought into making a movie funny and when Hollywood is laughing AT US, instead of vice versa. Miss this one. 1/10
I have never written a review before, but I feel that writing one is the best way to clean my mind of the crappy film I have witnessed. This movie was extremely awful. The humor attempts to be "offending", but it instead sounds like something an 8th grader finds humorous. In fact, even an 8th grader would tire of the pathetic nonsense that is Movie 43.
The plot centers around two teenagers that make up an outrageous picture. However, I've heard it's different for other parts of the world. I'm currently in the UK, so the kids wraparound is what I saw. Their little brother looks for it on the world wide web and ends up finding lots of clips that we get the displeasure of seeing. There's one called "The Catch" where Kate Winslet goes on a blind date with Hugh Jackman. However, get this: Hugh Jackman has penises where penises aren't supposed to be! Just hear the crickets sing. I can hear the screenwriter just laughing and laughing as he adds more unfunny jokes about poop and semen.
Also, the hilarious basketball sketch where they comment on the fact that basketball players are mostly black! Wow! It's so funny! Naked women and iPads! It's funny too!
In short, Movie 43 is a disjointed mess, full of lousy jokes, terrible writing, and actors that no doubt deserve to be in something else. Now, I'm going to rally up Best Actor/Actresses winners to be in my new screenplay, "Boners of Fire". Just kidding, of course. I'm not THAT evil.
The plot centers around two teenagers that make up an outrageous picture. However, I've heard it's different for other parts of the world. I'm currently in the UK, so the kids wraparound is what I saw. Their little brother looks for it on the world wide web and ends up finding lots of clips that we get the displeasure of seeing. There's one called "The Catch" where Kate Winslet goes on a blind date with Hugh Jackman. However, get this: Hugh Jackman has penises where penises aren't supposed to be! Just hear the crickets sing. I can hear the screenwriter just laughing and laughing as he adds more unfunny jokes about poop and semen.
Also, the hilarious basketball sketch where they comment on the fact that basketball players are mostly black! Wow! It's so funny! Naked women and iPads! It's funny too!
In short, Movie 43 is a disjointed mess, full of lousy jokes, terrible writing, and actors that no doubt deserve to be in something else. Now, I'm going to rally up Best Actor/Actresses winners to be in my new screenplay, "Boners of Fire". Just kidding, of course. I'm not THAT evil.
- retiredwire
- Jan 24, 2013
- Permalink
After a misleading Trailer I gave this "Comedy" a chance. To be honest this is the worst movie I have ever seen. You can only laugh about the "jokes" if you still have the humor of a 14 year old who is just reaching puberty. Seriously. Every joke is based on penis, pussy, flat sex and even shitting on your partner. Even the allusions towards other movies are so horribly done that there is no way to compare this level with a Tarantino style.
If this is how the Hollywoods "Crème de la Crème" defines self-irony they have lost all my respect.
In Short: A Vicarious Embarrassment
If this is how the Hollywoods "Crème de la Crème" defines self-irony they have lost all my respect.
In Short: A Vicarious Embarrassment
- nils-591-181774
- Jan 25, 2013
- Permalink
I can't understand why this movie has such a low rating. It was so funny from start to finish and maybe even a little cringe. I stumbled across this on Netflix and glad I did. Even the girlfriend enjoyed the humor.
I don't know what is wrong with the previous reviewer of this movie but apparently he/she is blind, deaf or was reading a book during this movie. It is simply awful. And by the way, the synopsis on this site isn't even close to being correct. The plot is a guy (Dennis Quaid) who is trying to pitch his many ridiculous movie ideas to a studio exec (Greg Kinnear). As Quaid is apparently describing them to Kinnear, a clip of the movie is shown to the audience. The ideas are completely absurd, uninspired and not at all funny in any way. It's a shame that all these top-name actors are so desperate for money to make such a film. Bigger shame is they won't get a dime! Save your money and your valuable time and don't see this movie!
Hilarious. That's all I need. My type of humor. I laughed a lot. Most of the skits are so funny. Some are alright. Crazy how many famous actors are in this.
EDIT: Watching this again 11 years after it came out, I think I might have laughed even more. I don't care how many people poop on this movie (lol), it's absolutely hilarious. I was cracking up throughout at the utter stupidity on display.
I disagree with one thing in my original review, even the worst skits are very funny. Definitely funnier than anything coming out these days. Updating rating from 8 to 9 stars.
Hugh Jackman 9 stars.
Liev Schreiber 9 stars.
Chris Pratt 8.5 stars.
Emma Stone 7.5 stars.
Jason Bateman 8 stars.
Chloe Grace Moretz 7.5 stars.
Sean Williams Scott 7 stars.
Halle Berry 7.5 stars.
Terrence Howard 9 stars.
Elizabeth Banks 9 stars.
IPod commercial 8 stars.
Overarching story 8 stars.
(3 viewings, 1/10/2024)
EDIT: Watching this again 11 years after it came out, I think I might have laughed even more. I don't care how many people poop on this movie (lol), it's absolutely hilarious. I was cracking up throughout at the utter stupidity on display.
I disagree with one thing in my original review, even the worst skits are very funny. Definitely funnier than anything coming out these days. Updating rating from 8 to 9 stars.
Hugh Jackman 9 stars.
Liev Schreiber 9 stars.
Chris Pratt 8.5 stars.
Emma Stone 7.5 stars.
Jason Bateman 8 stars.
Chloe Grace Moretz 7.5 stars.
Sean Williams Scott 7 stars.
Halle Berry 7.5 stars.
Terrence Howard 9 stars.
Elizabeth Banks 9 stars.
IPod commercial 8 stars.
Overarching story 8 stars.
(3 viewings, 1/10/2024)
The first time I tried watching this movie, I couldn't get past the first segment and stopped watching. Then one night, nothing was on, so I thought I would give this movie a second chance. I'm glad I did. Most of the segments are hilarious! A couple of them were not. "Kids in machines" for example. The two final segments, "Basketball" and "Beezle the cat" were great! If you enjoy twisted humor and are not easily offended, you will enjoy it. If you are "Woke" or very PC, you won't like it, and I recommend you skip it.
- thedarksteps
- Jan 24, 2013
- Permalink
I can't believe how bad this movie was. It's amazing to me that they got such high quality actors to take part in this piece of garbage. I can usually find some redeeming quality in most movies no matter how bad they are, but this is just a pile of crap. I almost asked for my money back. There wasn't one good thing about this. How on Earth did this movie get made. I'm shocked at how bad it was. How did someone hold a gun to the heads of all these talented actors to get this movie made. I can't say enough bad things about this. Wow! It even mentioned "Howard the Duck" as a bad movie. So, they know about bad movies. This will probably take the place of "Howard the Duck" as the worst movie of all time.
- jennifer-592-418424
- Jan 25, 2013
- Permalink
The storyline is really disconnected and forced. The jokes might be funny if you're in pre-K but for anyone else they're disgusting and awful.
Even if you thought Epic Movie and the rest of those movies were the greatest ever you may have trouble laughing.
This is the kind of movie where you spend most of it trying to figure out why anyone would consider going through the process of writing and directing it.
I can't imagine why these great actors would agree to do such an awful movie.
Even if you thought Epic Movie and the rest of those movies were the greatest ever you may have trouble laughing.
This is the kind of movie where you spend most of it trying to figure out why anyone would consider going through the process of writing and directing it.
I can't imagine why these great actors would agree to do such an awful movie.
- stevenwheeler10
- Jan 23, 2013
- Permalink
I just stepped out of theater,
want to just forget the last 2 hours. With this kind of budget and talent available a great movie could have been done. This is garbage movie.
Find it extremely strange to see such good talent being wasted for such a waste movie. I watched this movie just after Silver Lining play book, and regretted it buying this ticket.
There is absolute no art and creativity that can be cherished as an epic movie. As viewer we want to experience, this kind of movie deteriorates quality of comedy, This genre can just turn more awful.
want to just forget the last 2 hours. With this kind of budget and talent available a great movie could have been done. This is garbage movie.
Find it extremely strange to see such good talent being wasted for such a waste movie. I watched this movie just after Silver Lining play book, and regretted it buying this ticket.
There is absolute no art and creativity that can be cherished as an epic movie. As viewer we want to experience, this kind of movie deteriorates quality of comedy, This genre can just turn more awful.
Ok I've never written a review on here before and it's painfully obvious as to how late I am. However, what did you people expect from this movie? The entire point of it is that it was different segments with not much of a plot just trying to get some laughs out of people and it was hilarious. What did you people want an Oscar worthy comedy? No it was never meant to be that. Just to make you laugh and it was funny. If you did not find it funny then I'm guessing you are somebody who still thinks SNL is funny. It's gross out humor. Cmon people the home schooled segment was great. My god relax and take this movie for what it is. Again just different segments that really don't have a point beyond creating humor. That's exactly what it did.
- mvanekadhi
- Nov 18, 2019
- Permalink
As an avid and very frequent movie goer.. Its with great sorrow that I have to tell you this movie made my "Top 5 worst movies" list..
It has no valid point. the "jokes" are absolutely horrible. I kept waiting for a good part.. and there was not one. the best "skit" was probably Jason (in batman and robin).. but still that was very very bad. I was more amazed all these actors actually agreed to do this film.. what were you thinking !!!!! Having "B" actors like Lindsay L. in it probably would have made more sense.. this was bad.. if you go see it.. don't say you weren't warned. I wish I could just get my money back for my coke and popcorn :(
It has no valid point. the "jokes" are absolutely horrible. I kept waiting for a good part.. and there was not one. the best "skit" was probably Jason (in batman and robin).. but still that was very very bad. I was more amazed all these actors actually agreed to do this film.. what were you thinking !!!!! Having "B" actors like Lindsay L. in it probably would have made more sense.. this was bad.. if you go see it.. don't say you weren't warned. I wish I could just get my money back for my coke and popcorn :(
I don't know, maybe I just have a strange sense of humor, but I thought this movie was funny. I always find it funny when serious actors do slapstick roles. I watched it several times and I still find it funny. I say if you like movies like Airplane or Blazing Saddles, just a hell of a lot nastier and rude, then this is the movie for you.
- sdonancricchia
- Jun 7, 2017
- Permalink
Personally find it entertaining. Easy to watch. If you take out the crappy base storyline with the 3 twits it's OK. I don't think people realise the point of this film. It's just a sketch movie. It's not meant to be a masterpiece. Millions of people watch sketches like this on YouTube everyday but may a movie well that's just ridiculous, calm down. It's way better than south park which is just swearing angry kids and sex.
I will keep this short and to the point:
I wish I had read the reviews here before deciding to go catch a movie. This must be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There was probably 2 funny lines in the whole movie.
The format of the movie is good, many stories crammed into a movie, but the stories were too ridiculous, and clearly not funny. I cannot understand why some of the better known actors took part in this movie.
I have a warped sense of humor, but I feel totally ripped off. The group I was with all felt the same way.
Do not waste your time or money seeing this one.
I wish I had read the reviews here before deciding to go catch a movie. This must be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There was probably 2 funny lines in the whole movie.
The format of the movie is good, many stories crammed into a movie, but the stories were too ridiculous, and clearly not funny. I cannot understand why some of the better known actors took part in this movie.
I have a warped sense of humor, but I feel totally ripped off. The group I was with all felt the same way.
Do not waste your time or money seeing this one.
This movie has NO plot at all it is seriously lots of sick scenes jumbled together without making any sense AT ALL. They talk about Pooh's a lot and period jokes, there were a couple of scenes that were so gross I closed my eyes and covered my ears..don't watch it. I was DYING to see this for so long now I am disappointed...wait for DVD peoples trust me. there was at least 20 people in the cinema and 45 minutes into the movie it was me my friend and a couple of other people left..IM NOT KIDDING. it was that bad that half of the people in the cinema left. I don't know 1 person that actually enjoyed this. I work at a cinema and I m URGING people not to watch this. SAVE YOUR MONEY PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.
It angers me that people are able to give movies like this a 10/10 rating, it makes a mockery of the IMDb rating system, this film was beyond poor. Terrible premise, terrible humour, really quite atrocious. Even for people that enjoyed the movie, I can't see how they could rate it above an average 6.5/10. And before people start saying "oh you just didn't get it", or, "You don't get the humour" - I know funny, and this is not it. I honestly feel bad for the actors that have starred in this movie. I had high hopes for this movie after seeing the trailer, I'm just glad I didn't waste my money watching it at the cinema, gave the movie a chance and it disappointed me at every step.
- agent_dennis
- Jun 27, 2013
- Permalink
I gave this 1, as it won't allow you to review with zero! All the best bits were in the trailer. I don't mind a film that lets your mind have a break, but it is unforgivable to not be fun! Cast was impressive, I can only assume the makers either sold their soul or called in an awful lot of favours to get everyone on board.
Any film with Ms Farris is going to be crass toilet humour, and this film did have two of those three elements. It just missed of the humour! I appreciate sense of humour differs between across the Atlantic (how else can you explain How I met your mother or Seinfeld getting past the pilot episodes), but come on. This film created a new level of awful.
It's a total car crash of a movie. Usually in this style of movie at least one of the skits works, sadly not in this film.
For the Americans out there Possibly suggest this for Thanksgiving, because it is a massive turkey!
Any film with Ms Farris is going to be crass toilet humour, and this film did have two of those three elements. It just missed of the humour! I appreciate sense of humour differs between across the Atlantic (how else can you explain How I met your mother or Seinfeld getting past the pilot episodes), but come on. This film created a new level of awful.
It's a total car crash of a movie. Usually in this style of movie at least one of the skits works, sadly not in this film.
For the Americans out there Possibly suggest this for Thanksgiving, because it is a massive turkey!
- psgmarston69
- Feb 3, 2014
- Permalink