Fukrey 3

Sameer lodaya

What a movie was fukrey 1 followed by the 2nd was also good but the third did not match the level of fukrey

The content has no play in this movie as we all know we doesn't have to apply our minds while watching fukrey..the first half was bearable and had the hope that 2nd will be more better but it was worst..the movie suddenly left the charm because of long and creepy scenes some content was really yuks I don't know how they got the idea to entertain people with human waste

Chocha was same as before and maintained his madness with Pulkit, the legend pankajji ,Richa and Manjot all played very similar characters like they played before

It is very difficult to make sequels of a hit movie as people expect a lot and so we can expect fukrey 4 comes back with a bang

Regrets for low ratings.

The third installment of the successful comedy franchise Fukrey struggles to retain the charm of Fukrey (2013) and Fukrey Returns (2017) and hasn't been able to live up to the expectations. Mrighdeep Singh Lamba's direction was average and he was not able to deliver a compelling slapstick comedy this time due to its thin plot and mediocre writing.

The first half of the film starts off well and it has some entertaining moments that give several occasions of laughter. But the second half becomes a victim of lazy writing and it is comparatively less on humour & the witty one-liners rarely land. Then the story goes off-track and tries to showcase a serious issue of water supply in Delhi and also it has a disappointing climax too. After a point, the screenplay won't be able to hold viewers and humour also gets repetitive.

Varun Sharma in his tailor-made role as Choochaa and Pankaj Tripathi as Pandit ji delivers an entertaining performance. Both the actors keep the audience engaged with their impeccable comic timing. Pulkit Samrat and Manjot Singh were decent in their roles. Richa Chadha shines again as Bholi Punjaban and gave a good performance. All other supporting actors were just fine in their respective roles.

Direction 2.5/5 Acting 3/5 Dialogues 3/5 Story 2/5 Screenplay 2/5.

Pankaj tripathy was the only good thing about the movie. The jokes are poorly written and the script is weak which just seems pointless after a while. Its a sheer waste of time and the. Don't think imdb is reliable anymore, with such high ratings for such a film. It's a classic franchise killer. They should've stuck with the original writers from the first two parts which it seems they did not. Feels like I would need to rewatch the first two parts again now, just to protect the memory of the first two parts in my mind. Rest if you have a couple of hundred bucks, or more, to kill and want to increase your appreciation for the classic priyadarshan films, do go and watch it :)

Can't make you laugh. You wait till the end of movie and it doesn't come. Conclusion: "Drenched in Regret" is a perfect example of how not to make a film. Its lackluster storyline, poor acting, and failed attempts at humor leave audiences feeling like they've been caught in a never-ending rainstorm of disappointment. Perhaps it's best to leave this movie shipwrecked and seek out something that won't make you regret spending your time and money on it.am left with no choice but to give it a dismal 1-star rating. The poor story, abysmal acting, and unfunny jokes all contribute to this sinking ship of a movie.

Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres. Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres. Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres.