johmil-18374

WOW, I liked the new Batman a lot. The gritty but more realistic take on Batman (who already made such a transformation from Tim Burtons Batman to Nolans Batman).

This is more dirty and not afraid of taking it even further down to earth. Falcone in both versions are so involved in the beginning of everyting. The making of Batman, the cities tone and in this series the making of the Penguin.

The Penguin is a much more formidable opponent than people think. Learn from the best of the manipulative mind of psychopath Falcone. But his family is still around and they are dangerous but not as smart as daddy but equally psychotic and not dumb at all.

Penguins chance relationship with a kid turned out to be something of a fluke for both. You got to mix the flavours, you get it when you see it.

This series got the finger on the pulse of the city of Gotham and so far it has been hell of a ride.

It is hard to understand what the hype of this documentary is about. I seen plenty of these kind of documentaries when the basic theme simple dissolve in front of the camera since reality do not follow a script.

But the strange part is the good reviews and even prizes that this documentary got. It has a basic red thread and when that falls flat the documentary kind of tries out ten more possible stories. None of them works.

After reading some reviews it seems that some came to the conclusion that at least some of the people in the documentary has to lie. That is not my take on it. I see it as just a lot of loose threads, and no one can say anyting about them.

But for me the filmmaker seems to want to make a better story out of something that was probably nothing in the end.

I do not know if the documentary director wanted to bring herself into the documentary because she gets angry when things do not go the way she want it, and surprisingly she films her saying that too and question the people in the documentary.

It could be that she knowingly brings in the angle that she is the filmmaker and she do not know what to do when the story falls apart. Then she tries all angles to keep the documentary alive. But I do not think the story is such a meta story even though that would be interesting at least.

I seen all the 5 Dirty Harry movies in a week. Three of them was very entertaining. Two of them did not really work. It seems like I am in agreement with most people regarding the two first beeing the strongest. But this movie is at least on par with them.

The bad guys here are so bloody nasty. But the heroine also goes way to far when she kill people who seem to regret what they did and are far from what they where at the time. But this dubious moral from her is what is interesting as well.

But the worst person of the antagonist bunch is just terrible and the worst of the worst, and he is still not cartoonishly evil. Because he feels like could be real. You really want the worst for this guy.

Too me this was the most engaging of the movies. The first Dirty Harry may have been the best acting. The second has such great and menacing camera shot out on the road. It is just a great motorcycle/car movie. And this one too me is the most engaging story and a disgusting psycho bad guy, that fits the bill for someone you want too see beeing "put away".