Oren Cass

Cass is Jewish, and grew up outside Boston, Massachusetts.^[6] He attended Williams College, where he received a Bachelor of Arts in political economy.^[7]

After graduating from Williams College, Cass joined Bain & Company as an associate consultant,^[1] where he worked in the firm's Boston and New Delhi offices.^[7] He took a six-month leave to work on the Mitt Romney 2008 presidential campaign, in which Romney was defeated in the presidential primary.^[1] He then enrolled in Harvard Law School, where he said he sought "to deepen his understanding of public policy" and established contact with Romney's staff, which hired him as a domestic policy advisor when Romney again ran for president in 2012.^[1][3][1][7]

He worked for the next Romney operation in 2011 between his second and third years at Harvard, and ended up with so much in his portfolio that at the end of the summer "they sort of said, well, you have to stay". He became domestic-policy director while still in law school.^[1]

After Romney was defeated in the 2012 election, Cass returned to Bain, where he became a manager, but also "started writing on environmental and labor policy for National Review.^[1] U.S. Senator Marco Rubio credited Cass for his 2014 poverty-fighting plan, according to Politico.^[3][8] The following year, in 2015, he joined the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research as a senior fellow, and was named to Politico's list of the top 50 "thinkers, doers and visionaries transforming American politics in 2015".^[3]

In 2018, Cass published his book, The Once and Future Worker, which reevaluated American society, economics, and public policy, and introduces what he called "the Working Hypothesis: that a labor market in which workers can support strong families and communities is the central determinant of long-term prosperity and should be the central focus of public policy". He argues that the obsessive focus of policymakers and economists on "consumer welfare" is misguided because, as workers and productive contributors, people flourish and build strong families and communities.

National Affairs editor Yuval Levin called it "the essential policy book for our time".^[3] National Review wrote that, "[t]his book and its policy proposals mark Oren Cass as one of the nation's most original and forceful policy thinkers".^[9] Jason Furman, chairman of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, described it as "a thoughtful, provocative, carefully argued book that made me change my mind on some issues that I thought I'd thought about quite a lot".^[10] The book was reviewed in The New Yorker,^[11] The Economist,^[12] and Foreign Affairs.^[13]

Donald J. Boudreaux of the American Institute for Economic Research disputed some of the book's positions, asserting that Cass focuses too heavily on the importance of production over consumption, to the point of extolling measures such as tariffs that coerce society into purchasing goods that would not be the first choice of uncoerced consumers.^[14]

American Compass

In February 2020, Cass founded American Compass, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank,^[15] which is self-described as focusing on "what the post-Trump right-of-center is going to be."^[5] Later, ahead of the 2024 election, American Compass laid out a set of economic policies intended for a second Trump administration.^[16]

As of July 2024^[update], American Compass is a member of the advisory board of Project 2025,^[17] a collection of conservative policy proposals from the Heritage Foundation to reshape the United States federal government and consolidate executive power should the Republican nominee win the 2024 presidential election.^[18]

Cass has argued for several changes to conservatism, including:

Free markets and Tariff

Under Cass, the group has strongly questioned the belief that free markets should be given primacy when setting public policy. Cass has described this "free market fundamentalism" as "pathetically simplistic."^[15] Cass and the grouping hold that it is not only absolutely proper for society to intervene in the market but also necessary for it to do so.^[15] Cass has strongly defended Trump tariffs and the resulting inflation, instability and trade wars.^[19][20][21] However, Cass prefers a phase-in period because factories take time to build.^[22]

Industry and trade

Cass has advocated for unionization that enables workers to collectively bargain for sector-wide pay standards and working conditions.^[23] He argues that local industry should be protected by an across-the-board 10% tariff on imported goods, which would increase by 5% annually until trade deficits are brought to zero, while investment in local industry would be funded by a national development bank.^[23]

Environment

In 2017, Cass wrote an essay framing rejection of strong measures to combat climate change as a form of moderation, criticizing both those on the political right who question the validity of climate science and those on the political left he characterized as suffering from depression and misusing data to paint a picture of imminent catastrophe.^[24]