Oncology extension - episode tables included in DDL but not extra columns in `measurement` · Issue #738 · OHDSI/CommonDataModel · GitHub
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
modifier_of_event_id | A foreign key identifier to the event (e.g. condition, procedure, episode) record for which the modifier is recorded.
modifier_of_field_concept_id | The concept representing the table field concept that contains the value of the event id for which the modifier is recorded (e.g. CONDITION_OCCURRENCE.condition_occurre nce_id).
Some parts of oncology extension are in DDL but not all of the parts of that extension.
Users may be surprised and expect it is there either fully or not at all.
Or maybe the modification was made after it was incorporated partially (so there may be a good explanation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@vojtechhuser I would like some further clarity on this, if it was added later and the CDM was not updated or if it was there at the inception of the extension and just missed in the CDM. Either way, this can be considered for CDM v5.x-2026
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
(this item requires perhaps additional verbal commentary)
modifier_of_event_id and modifier_of_field_concept_id are not in DDL code
from https://github.com/OHDSI/OncologyWG/wiki/MEASUREMENT
modifier_of_event_id | A foreign key identifier to the event (e.g. condition, procedure, episode) record for which the modifier is recorded.
modifier_of_field_concept_id | The concept representing the table field concept that contains the value of the event id for which the modifier is recorded (e.g. CONDITION_OCCURRENCE.condition_occurre nce_id).
Some parts of oncology extension are in DDL but not all of the parts of that extension.
Users may be surprised and expect it is there either fully or not at all.
Or maybe the modification was made after it was incorporated partially (so there may be a good explanation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: