8000 failure to build rocSPARSE for gfx950 · Issue #738 · ROCm/rocPRIM · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

failure to build rocSPARSE for gfx950 #738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
trixirt opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

failure to build rocSPARSE for gfx950 #738

trixirt opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@trixirt
Copy link
trixirt commented May 12, 2025

gfx950 is a new target in ROCm 6.4.0
When building there is this error

/usr/include/rocprim/intrinsics/atomic.hpp:210:6: error: support for 128-bit atomics not implemented for current architecture

#elif defined(HIP_DEVICE_COMPILE)
// Please submit an issue or pull request!
#error support for 128-bit atomics not implemented for current architecture
#endif
@Snektron
Copy link
Contributor

This problem was resolved by #700. Judging from the PR date, it was made very close to the ROCm 6.4.0 release, so I'm not surprised that it didn't make it in. Regardless, if you update rocPRIM to the develop branch then it should work.

@Naraenda
Copy link
Member

@umfranzw @stanleytsang-amd Do you know if #700 is included with next patch release?

@stanleytsang-amd
Copy link
Collaborator
stanleytsang-amd commented May 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

IIRC, gfx950 support was not scheduled for ROCm 6.4, it was scheduled for ROCm 6.5, so in that sense the ticket premise is not valid. However, due to the uncertainty of 6.5, it might be prudent to get it in for 6.4.2 - but I'll have to check with management on that one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@Snektron @trixirt @Naraenda @stanleytsang-amd
0