You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The read function has a ton of parameters, and all they do is turn on or off different outputs, though the work of reading them is done either way. It would probably be better to output the metadata as a dictionary, with keys like 'cuelabels', etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For backward compatibility with the original function, maybe its better to leave it that way.
But indeed it could be replace by a dictionnary with all set to true by default. It has to be made in consoderation of the original project the code has been extracted (see README).
I dont plan to actively develop this ATM cause I dont need it anymore but if valuable pull requests are proposed Ill consider them. :)
By "original", you mean Joseph Ernest's version, right? Not SciPy's? SciPy only returns rate, data, so rate, data, bits, metadata would be good, I think. I'll modify my fork if you're not interested
@endolith
As far as I remember it isbthe SciPy version moded.
But if you can assure that it is done in the same logic that this original version then feel free to propose your pull requests an Ill merge it.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The
read
function has a ton of parameters, and all they do is turn on or off different outputs, though the work of reading them is done either way. It would probably be better to output the metadata as a dictionary, with keys like'cuelabels'
, etcThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: