You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I came across a potential correctness issue in the arithmetic optimization when using opt.optsmt_engine=symba. The two following inputs, which appear semantically similar, yield different objective values:
$ z3 opt.optsmt_engine=symba small_int.smt2
sat
(objectives
((- a) oo)
(a oo)
)
$ cat small_int.smt2
(set-option :opt.priority box)
(declare-const a Int)
(assert (< 0 (div a 0)))
(maximize (- a))
(maximize a)
(check-sat)
(get-objectives)
$ z3 opt.optsmt_engine=symba small_mix.smt2
sat
(objectives
((- a) 0)
(a 0)
)
$ cat small_mix.smt2
(set-option :opt.priority box)
(declare-const a Real)
(assert (< 0 (div (to_int a) 0)))
(maximize (- a))
(maximize a)
(check-sat)
(get-objectives)
Hi,
I came across a potential correctness issue in the arithmetic optimization when using
opt.optsmt_engine=symba
. The two following inputs, which appear semantically similar, yield different objective values:Commit: 423930d
Additionally, while inspecting, I encountered a possible memory leak:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: