Structure issue in Change log after conversion from t2t to md #16662
Labels
blocked
component/documentation
p5
https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda/blob/master/projectDocs/issues/triage.md#priority
triaged
Has been triaged, issue is waiting for implementation.
Milestone
There are various structure issues in the change log after the conversion from t2t to md file format, where nested lists are not nested anymore.
Here is an example with the first one.
Steps to reproduce:
Look at change log, in section 2022.2, subsection new feature, after item "New table navigation commands have been added."
Actual behavior:
The two following items are at the same level
Expected behavior:
The two following items should be a sublist of 2 items since these gestures are for table navigation.
NVDA logs, crash dumps and other attachments:
N/A
System configuration
NVDA installed/portable/running from source:
N/A
NVDA version:
2024.2beta3
Windows version:
N/A
Name and version of other software in use when reproducing the issue:
N/A
Other information about your system:
N/A
Other questions
Does the issue still occur after restarting your computer?
N/A
Have you tried any other versions of NVDA? If so, please report their behaviors.
If NVDA add-ons are disabled, is your problem still occurring?
N/A
Does the issue still occur after you run the COM Registration Fixing Tool in NVDA's tools menu?
N/A
Note
The issue is due to missing spaces in the indentation of the sublists.
The following regexp allows to find the location of such issues:
But one needs to look around these locations to find all the issues, in case of multiple list levels. I.e. this regexp is not enough to find and fix all the indentation issues automatically.
There are at least between 200 and 250 lines impacted. I may fix the issue in the English file. However, with the current translation system, this will lead to more than 200 new lines to translate for each translator. Instead, I imagine that when the change log has migrated to Crowdin, translators will not be impacted anymore with such structural change (e.g. add-on an indentation level on a list item). If it is confirmed, I'd rather wait for the migration to be complete before submitting a fix.
@michaelDCurran or @seanbudd what is your opinion on this? Or have you another idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: