8000 Utilization of same next hop when not expected · Issue #57 · nasa/HDTN · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Utilization of same next hop when not expected #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
patchesgarcia opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment
907F
Open

Utilization of same next hop when not expected #57

patchesgarcia opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@patchesgarcia
Copy link

Using figure 8 (HDTN Four Nodes STCP Routing test) from the user guide as reference.

The desired setup is to have node 4 act as a final destination sink. Node 1 will send data to its final destination using node 3 as a router. In parallel we would also like to have another source node (node 5) use node 2 as a router to send data to node 4. Two independent data pipelines sending data to the same final destination, node 4.

The above can be done without issue. However, once we add an additional next hop to one of the source nodes both source nodes use the same next hop. This is not expected behavior and the hope was to continue to replicate the two parallel independent pipelines as previously described. For example holding all else true, if node 1's HDTN config file has node 2 simply added to it then the end result will have both node 1 and 5 use node 2 as the router. We would like this behavior only after manipulating node 3 to become unavailable so as to allow the router to update optimal path choice based on link status.

Can what is being described be done? We are using TCPCL and the default routing algorithm which I believe is Dijkstra's algorithm according to the README. When we add the next hop the corresponding contact is created in the contact plan with similar settings so as to not skew one contact being favored over another.

@rdudukov
Copy link
Contributor

We will look into this and get back to you. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0