8000 `/public/[filename].gz` missing `Content-Encoding: gzip` Header · Issue #3379 · nitrojs/nitro · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

/public/[filename].gz missing Content-Encoding: gzip Header #3379

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
OrbisK opened this issue May 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

/public/[filename].gz missing Content-Encoding: gzip Header #3379

OrbisK opened this issue May 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
pending triage

Comments

@OrbisK
Copy link
OrbisK commented May 30, 2025

Environment

https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-r5nvmagd?file=server%2Froutes%2Findex.ts,server%2Fpublic%2Fnitro.js

Reproduction

https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-r5nvmagd?file=server%2Froutes%2Findex.ts,server%2Fpublic%2Fnitro.js

  1. run reproduction
  2. open network tab
  3. inspect .gz file response headers in network tab

Describe the bug

Reproduced nuxt/nuxt#26420 in nitro-only

Additional context

No response

Logs


      		
    

      
  





        



            
            

              
            

        

      


      
    








      

    



      

  
            


  

  

    
  


  

      

    @kricsleo
kricsleo



    mentioned this issue
    
      May 31, 2025
    





  


  

      
   Draft

  





  
  

      
        
      
      

  
    
    
  


    8 tasks
  





  









      

  
      



  

  @kricsleo





  


    

      

  

    

        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  

      
    

  


  

      

  
  Member


      

  


  
    

      

      
            kricsleo
  

      

      

      commented


        Jun 2, 2025


      
    


  




      


        


  
    

      
          
Although I created #3381, I'm now unsure if Content-Encoding: gzip should be automatically added for .gz files.


This header would cause the browser to unzip the file. It might be useful in your scenarios where you want to use the JS content directly in the browser, but what if the user wants to download the raw .gz file? The browser will always unzip the file with this header before saving it to disk.

      		
    

  





        


            

            
            

              
            

        

      


      

            
  
  

    
  
    
    

  

  

  


    












      

  
      



  

  @OrbisK





  


    

      

  

    

        
    
    

  


      
          
  
      
            Copy link

  

      
    

  


  

      



      

  Author


  


  
    

      

      
            OrbisK
  

      

      

      commented


        Jun 2, 2025


      
    


  




      


        


  
    

      
          
Perhaps we should give the user the option of whether or not to inject headers. We could add a publicApplyHeader function to apply headers via configuration.

      		
    

  





        


            

            
            

              
            

        

      


      

            
  
  

    
  
    
    

  

  

  


    
















  
  

    

      

  





  




  
  

              

  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment


  



  






  
                  




    

  


      
  

    Assignees
  



        

    No one assigned







      


  


  

    Labels
  



    

      

    pending triage









      

  

    

        

    Projects
  


        




    None yet




  



      


  

    
  

    Milestone
  


      No milestone





    
      
          


  

    

      
        

          
    

    Development
  




            
    
No branches or pull requests







      
    

  




      

    

  
      

  

    

      2 participants
    

    

        
          @kricsleo 
        
          @OrbisK 
    

  






    

    




    






  

          

        



    



  





    

  


  


          



    



  

    

    

    





    


    

    

  



0