8000 Public sharing of collections · Issue #1160 · outline/outline · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Public sharing of collections #1160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
matbrgz opened this issue Jan 12, 2020 · 47 comments
Open

Public sharing of collections #1160

matbrgz opened this issue Jan 12, 2020 · 47 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature Big ideas for the future pinned Will not be closed by stale bot sharing

Comments

@matbrgz
Copy link
Contributor
matbrgz commented Jan 12, 2020

Share one item isnt enough. I'm considering to implement the shareable collection link. How to start this implementation? Could some one help? Is possible to implement this on fast ring?

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Jan 14, 2020

This is also similar to #1141

@tommoor tommoor added feature Big ideas for the future idea labels Jan 14, 2020
@Keeperr
Copy link
Keeperr commented Jul 2, 2020

I agree. I need this as well.

@stale
Copy link
stale bot commented Apr 9, 2021

Hey! The issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed soon if no further activity occurs. Please reply here if you wish for the issue to be kept open.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 9, 2021
@jpxd
Copy link
jpxd commented Apr 15, 2021

Please keep this issue open.
Sharing an entire collection via public link would be wonderful.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 15, 2021
@stale
Copy link
stale bot commented Jul 14, 2021

Hey! The issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed soon if no further activity occurs. Please reply here if you wish for the issue to be kept open.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 14, 2021
@matbrgz
Copy link
Contributor Author
matbrgz commented Jul 14, 2021

uP

@shtefcs
Copy link
shtefcs commented Aug 5, 2021

Exactly what is Outline missing. This small feature would give totally new dimension to the Outline, where it can be used for public documentation, wikis and so on.

Related: #2426

@stale
Copy link
stale bot commented Nov 3, 2021

Hey! The issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed soon if no further activity occurs. Please reply here if you wish for the issue to be kept open.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 3, 2021
@jpxd
Copy link
jpxd commented Nov 3, 2021

Still relevant

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Nov 3, 2021
@shtefcs
Copy link
shtefcs commented Nov 3, 2021

Still relevant

True

@tommoor tommoor added the pinned Will not be closed by stale bot label Nov 3, 2021
@thenanyu thenanyu self-assigned this Nov 9, 2021
@thenanyu
Copy link
Contributor
thenanyu commented Nov 9, 2021

@matbrgz — assuming you haven't done significant work on this, I will take it on in the coming weeks

@alapini
Copy link
alapini commented Nov 9, 2021

The first thing that come in mind to anyone around me when seeing Outline is "wow, it will be great for our Public doc"...
Can't imagine not being able to make that beautiful docs public :)

please prioritize it

@shtefcs
Copy link
shtefcs commented Nov 9, 2021

@matbrgz — assuming you haven't done significant work on this, I will take it on in the coming weeks

That will be super awesome!

@tommoor tommoor moved this to Todo in Q1 Roadmap Jan 6, 2022
@tommoor tommoor moved this from Todo to In Progress in Q1 Roadmap Jan 19, 2022
@tommoor tommoor moved this from In Progress to Roadmap in Q1 Roadmap Jan 25, 2022
@tommoor tommoor removed this from Q1 Roadmap Apr 17, 2022
@daveaevion
Copy link

For everybody looking to share documents publicly, what you can do is create and share a top level document in your collection and nest all docs within it. By nesting within a document instead of just the collection, you can share both the top level doc and all nested docs. It’s annoying that we can’t share a collection, but at least this is a working solution for now

@mariojfduarte
Copy link

will this go forward?

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Aug 18, 2023

Yes, but Nan no longer works on the project

@shtefcs
Copy link
shtefcs commented Aug 18, 2023

Yes, but Nan no longer works on the project

What do you mean? Is the project abandoned?

8000

@lxxself
Copy link
lxxself commented Dec 5, 2023

How is the Guide - Outline implemented? It looks like "Public Share Link of Collections".

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Dec 5, 2023

It is a shared document as described here – the functionality is very similar to a shared collection, just one level down which is one of the reasons this has been deprioritized in favor of other work.

@multiple1
Copy link
multiple1 commented Jan 9, 2024

Hello!
This is a pretty old discussion, has high demand and still no progress?
Most other platforms provide some functionality to show pages which are marked public without any login.
Is there some better workaround e.g. how to auto login a guest user which has view only permissions?

Otherwise we have to take e.g. wiki.js, but it's site navigation sidebar is not the most user-friendly one,...

@EduNetEurope
Copy link

Sharing a document and all nested documents is great except for the fact that it's an all or nothing option.
We cannot select which nested documents should be shared and which ones should not.
The only option is to unpublish some of them, but this will put them in the "Drafts" folder, where team members won't find them easily.

If we could toggle on/off "public" for each individual document, sharing a document with nested documents would work for us.

@michaelmwu
Copy link

I would like this as well.

@Nudelsuppe42
Copy link

Hey, we would really like this feature. Are there any plans of implementation yet? I've seen it has been added to a Roadmap but then removed again.
It would be really useful for us to not have to create a document with children to be able to share our public documentation, since this additional layer is complicating things for both us admins and our staff team.

@EduNetEurope
Copy link

We should be able to set different custom domains or subdomains for different collections: #4077

Should this request and #1141 be merged?

@keithfawcett
Copy link

I'm surprised this feature hasn't been implemented. Only being able to share one page at a time and not having a sidebar that shows everything in the collection for public users is unfortunate.

@EduNetEurope
Copy link
EduNetEurope commented May 12, 2024

Especially for product documentation we'd love to be able to share a whole collection publicly. Further more it would be amazing if we share a collection publicly to have the possibility to add custom domains per collection.

For example: Outline instance: https://outline.mydomain.org/ Collections:

Awesome-Product
    https://outline.mydomain.org/collection/awesomeproduct-coIve9wob2 (internal editor link)
    https://doc.awesomeproduct.org/ (publicly available readonly link)

I think this would be a unique and very handy feature. What do you think about it?

@tommoor
Are public collections that can be mapped to different subdomains on the roadmap?

It would be absolutely amazing if we could enable password-protection for publicly shared collections:

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented May 12, 2024

Collection sharing is under development, next feature on the roadmap – I'm not sure yet if they will gain custom domains or not out of the box as this will need tight integration with billing for the cloud edition.

@tommoor tommoor self-assigned this May 12, 2024
@almereyda

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@MFYDev
Copy link
MFYDev commented Jul 13, 2024

Just found outline and switched to this from Bookstack and found cannot share a whole collection is driving me crazy.

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Jul 13, 2024

Soon, in the meantime have a single document inside the collection and share that instead.

@tommoor tommoor changed the title Public Share Link of Collections Public sharing of collections Aug 29, 2024
@jacotec
Copy link
jacotec commented Sep 11, 2024

Soon, in the meantime have a single document inside the collection and share that instead.

Any update / estimation here? With each new version that's the first thing I look at ... I'd really appreciate this feature :-)

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Sep 12, 2024

How do you hope this to be different from sharing a document?

Novapixel1010 reacted with thumbs up emoji

@Nudelsuppe42
Copy link

Well, lets say i want to publish documentation for everyone (say, with a saas) but at the same time want to have a place for the dev team to write internal docs. I would create two teams (dev and support) with each a own collection. The support team does nlt need any additional documents in its collection so i would want to share the entire collection, because ltherwise i would have a collection with a single Nested document in it.
It would just be way more convenient to have shareable collections.

@EduNetEurope
Copy link

Collection sharing is under development, next feature on the roadmap – I'm not sure yet if they will gain custom domains or not out of the box as this will need tight integration with billing for the cloud edition.

Hi @tommoor,

Will we be able to assign different logos for shared collections - I am not talking about icons but about what is now the workspace logo in the upper left corner of the page. It would be amazing to define a logo for each collection (use case: wikis for different projects we have, each project has its own logo).

With shared documents, the name of the shared document appears in the left menu. I hope the name of the shared collection will be hidden or appear as a kind of header?

Will the shared collections have custom domains? It would be absolutely amazing if they did.

When will the feature be released?

@almereyda
Copy link

Together with your comment in #4077 (comment) I get the impression that you are trying to rebuild the deactivated team sites feature in self-hosted with collections.

We have recently seen in some regressions, that the code paths for team sites were very well accessible by the current implementation. Unfortunately activating them would violate the license.

@mkaskov
Copy link
mkaskov commented Feb 6, 2025

So what about public sharing collection? when it could be possible?
I cant choose this platform without this feature...

@AldeRoberge
Copy link

I tried all popular documentation software, and Outline is the best (aesthetic, ease of setup, quality of setup documentation, functionality), only thing missing is public sharing with clean URLs (customizable, without random ids)

@tommoor
Copy link
Member
tommoor commented Mar 6, 2025

@AldeRoberge it's not super clear but you can already customize the link in the share dialog:
https://docs.getoutline.com/s/guide/doc/sharing-LG2sGOLIpl#h-publish-to-web

@AldeRoberge
Copy link
AldeRoberge commented Mar 6, 2025

@AldeRoberge it's not super clear but you can already customize the link in the share dialog: https://docs.getoutline.com/s/guide/doc/sharing-LG2sGOLIpl#h-publish-to-web

I think it's pretty clear as is, :) The only problem is that we can't change the URL of nested documents.

Image

Root :
Image

Nested :
Image

Also, for some reason, the dialog box is short (but somewhat scrollable)

@Novapixel1010
Copy link

This feature would be great. I say focus on getting the core of the feature working. yes it would be nice to have clean url but atleast for me not super important.

If someone from the team wants to guide me in the right direction I would like to help get this feature finished.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Big ideas for the future pinned Will not be closed by stale bot sharing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0