-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Species tree not binary but appears to be binary in figtree #204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
there is a trifurcation in the middle. |
I apologize for posting here. Where is the bpp discussion group? |
Ziheng, I've tried to run a smaller tree to figure out the issue using this newick tree. It runs with this: But when I add another species and adjust the parenthesis, I receive the species tree not binary in the "Summary of alignments after phasing sequences" and the program stops running. I do no understand why bpp is saying this in not binary format when each node has only two branches? |
Hi @ngripshover , |
If anyone else runs into this issue, I used the program mesquite to create a tree and then exported the tree in newick format to use as my starting tree if bpp. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I am having trouble running the A11 species delimination tree. I was able to run the example files but using my own data is causing an issue.
My tree appears to be binary but I am recieving the error message: "Species tree is not binary".
Here is my newick tree for the species tree and I have attached the figtree output of this newick tree format:
(G_ca, (S_fr, ((S_se, S_ep), (S_at, (((T_boc, T_cal), T_ceb),(T_oax, (((T_ver, T_arm), T_mel),((((((((((T_tae, T_imp), T_sla),T_rub), T_sup), T_cuc), (T_can, T_lin)), T_sch), T_alt), (((T_wil, ((T_cor, T_rel),((T_pla, T_yaq),((T_hob, T_gra),(T_atr, T_nig))))))))))))))));
Could anyone help me solve this problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: