Is it good to add more configuration options to the evcxr.toml file?
#368
baiguoname
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
@davidlattimore What do you think about it? If you think it's fine, I'm glad to make a pr. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Sure, I think making more use of a declarative configuration file makes sense. I've occasionally regretted that I put so much configuration in place via commands rather than in a config file. A PR for that would be great. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is an example of what the `evcxr.toml' file looks like:
I can think of serveral advantages to this approache:
Cargo.tomlfile add more configuration options, we don't have to change the existing codes.[source.crates-io].Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions