Closed
Description
The syntax <expr> <pipe> <lambda> is unambiguous and consistent with existing semantics, so we could add it as a convenience over <expr> <pipe> (<lambda>), though we'd have to ensure that
a |> x -> x |> f
was parsed as
a |> x -> (x |> f)
and not as
a |> (x -> x) |> f
to be consistent with current precedence ordering.