You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
Query supports an optional match operator, however the syntax is subtle (a trailing ? on the predicate) and the part of the query that is optional is determined by that query lines subject & object variables. This gets more confusing if there are multiple optional matches. This should be moved to Sparqls optional match format where its much clearer both that there is an optional match, and what the optional match is made up of.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Query supports an optional match operator, however the syntax is subtle (a trailing ? on the predicate) and the part of the query that is optional is determined by that query lines subject & object variables. This gets more confusing if there are multiple optional matches. This should be moved to Sparqls optional match format where its much clearer both that there is an optional match, and what the optional match is made up of.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: