8000 Communication CFT Weekly [2025-02-17] · eclipse-score · Discussion #400 · GitHub

More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Eclipse S-CORE

Communication CFT Weekly [2025-02-17] #400

qor-lb started this conversation in Communication FT

qor-lb
Feb 17, 2025
Collaborator

Participants

Thilo Schmitt @thilo-schmitt
Nico Hartmann @HartmannNico
Armin Bartsch @armin-acn
Martin Mössmer @mmoessmer-acn
Danial Norouzi Seyed
Arvid Sievert @arsibo
Oliver Emrich @olivembo
Dirk Linhos
Ulrich Huber @LittleHuba

Agenda

CFT lead election
AI's from the workshop
- AI7 (@eclipse-score/cft-communication): Define the COM API applicable for Lola and Iceoryx2.
  Participants: Nico (Qorix), Christian/Mathias (Qorix/Ekxide), Ulrich H./Manuel F. (BMW), Ulrich F. (ETAS/Bosch), Mark (MB/MB TI), Daniel (Continental).
- D3: The COM API will be implemented by Lola for version 0.5.
  Optional goal: Iceoryx2 may serve as an alternative implementation after AI5 is resolved.
- D5: Defining the approach for bindings or gateways is not a goal for the 0.5 release. The proposed solutions keep the door open for both directions. Any risk invalidating this assumption must be raised to the architecture community.
Feedback Workshop

Meeting Minutes

to 1.

Ulrich Huber elected as the CFT lead for IPC 🥳
@LittleHuba to invite series (monday 15-16)

to 2.

@qor-lb discuss with the tech-lead circle where to maintain design decisions
@HartmannNico to align invitation for com api breakout, in person event in Ulm

to 3.
Improve:

Attendance online was hard to follow due to missing camera of the presenter & white board
If hybrid attendance is enabled next time, reserve time to check the questions online
Keep more focus on the technical discussions
Specific boundaries for what content should be reflected in the contribution pitch
Better time boxing (pitches & setup)
Small breaks between contribution pitches
More time for the grooming (3h should be sufficient)
Use the grooming to define clearer next steps (i.e. reviews, contribution continuation)

Keep:

Contribution pitches in general are a good idea
Discussion based on existing solutions/code
Good technical discussions & very competent audience
Open & proactive atmosphere

Misc:

AI @thilo-schmitt proposal how contributions are reviewied & merged (review in architecture community)

Replies: 0 comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

0