Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
The Win32 API headers in Microwindows may not be compatible with Microsoft's implementation, and were developed for the reverse use: implementing Win32 on Linux or other non-Windows systems. I have no idea if they might work, and they don't contain any information about which Windows system DLLs to link to. Why not just use the normal Windows development system header files? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I asked because I was wondering if it is possible to use it as a means of porting software (and not emulate on Wine). Even if it is not compatible, I can use it to make sure the GUI is portable among Nano-X implementations. Port on Windows, run on Linux (or some other Unix). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
that idea could work if you restrict yourself to the winapi subset supported by micro-windows. see #26 (comment) for a discussion of that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would like to use Nano-X to provide the Win32 GUI api on my Windows 10 x64 instead of Windows headers
(of course not the system parts).
If there is a guide I would be even happier.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions