You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there! Can you help me with the question about using the model in an inductive setting, please?
Let's assume, we want to get the model scores for a pair of vertices not presented in training set. According to the code, we need to use calculated relational paths which rely only on the training set. It means that for new vertices there will be no paths connecting them with vertices in the training set. What should we do in such a case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there! Can you help me with the question about using the model in an inductive setting, please?
Let's assume, we want to get the model scores for a pair of vertices not presented in training set. According to the code, we need to use calculated relational paths which rely only on the training set. It means that for new vertices there will be no paths connecting them with vertices in the training set. What should we do in such a case?
Hey! Your question is related to mine: hyren/PathCon#1 (comment). But I still haven't received a response from the authors.
Hi there! Can you help me with the question about using the model in an inductive setting, please?
Let's assume, we want to get the model scores for a pair of vertices not presented in training set. According to the code, we need to use calculated relational paths which rely only on the training set. It means that for new vertices there will be no paths connecting them with vertices in the training set. What should we do in such a case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: