You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You have added the operators *AND* and *OR* to the SourceCode rule type. Looking into it, I realized that you're checking for the existence of both operators in the same rule, but that doesn't make sense!
Interpreting the above rule with this logic (from left-to-right) would be as follows: both the strings "potato" AND "chips" have to exist, and then, either "chips" OR "lays" could exist!
It would make sense if I read it this way, you're implying that either the *AND* operator statement holds true or the *OR* operator statement holds true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Either way, I have updated EKFiddle2Yara to account for the new operators *AND* and *OR* that were added recently to the EKFiddle rule language. EKFiddle2Yara treats them as mutually exclusive to a given rule. Only one of the operators is accounted for in a given rule.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi, Jérôme,
You have added the operators *AND* and *OR* to the SourceCode rule type. Looking into it, I realized that you're checking for the existence of both operators in the same rule, but that doesn't make sense!
For example,
SourceCode HellowWorld potato *AND* chips *OR* lays
Interpreting the above rule with this logic (from left-to-right) would be as follows: both the strings "potato" AND "chips" have to exist, and then, either "chips" OR "lays" could exist!
It would make sense if I read it this way, you're implying that either the *AND* operator statement holds true or the *OR* operator statement holds true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: