You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the above commands, I am using haploid reads to obtain genotypes, then filtering the heterozygous variants, and finally using the filtered genotypes to reconstruct the haploid haplotype from the imputed filtered genotypes.
My question is: Is this the correct way to use KAGE to reconstruct haplotypes? The input multiallelic VCF is converted to biallelic with bcftools norm -m -any command.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Interesting question, but unfortunately I don' have so much knowledge or experience with haplotype reconstruction. I have a feeling your approach makes sense and could work, but I guess the only way to know would be to maybe du some tests/benchmarks where you simulate reads from a single haplotype and check whether you actually get that haplotype back. One way could be to must simulate reads from the reference genome. Then you would expect your pipeline to give something very similar to the reference genome out in the end (and kage to call most genotypes as 0/0).
@sandve, I am working on reconstructing a haploid haplotype using the imputed genotypes from KAGE. Currently, I am using the following commands:
In the above commands, I am using haploid reads to obtain genotypes, then filtering the heterozygous variants, and finally using the filtered genotypes to reconstruct the haploid haplotype from the imputed filtered genotypes.
My question is: Is this the correct way to use KAGE to reconstruct haplotypes? The input multiallelic VCF is converted to biallelic with
bcftools norm -m -any
command.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: