Replies: 23 comments 66 replies
-
|
@edewit This sounds fantastic ! But how would the actual content of the page be defined ? Through .ftl ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This would not involve any FreeMarker templates, as these UIs are written in React. We would provide APIs like the one mentioned here by Erik, which will allow developers to programmatically define navigational elements, pages, tabs, forms, etc. in a declarative manner on the Java-side of things. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I didn't quite understand how I would build and style my own custom HTML pages with this API ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, that would eventually be made possible with this API and other APIs that will be introduced in the future. We will likely also add the ability to register a page and render custom HTML into it, but that should always be a last resort in case existing APIs do not cover the use-case. At this point we're still looking for feedback on what a possible 'Customization API' would look like, and what is required of it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You wouldn't style and create custom html pages, once you implement this SPI the pages will be created for you.
So atm this API doesn't support the key value editor, but you could use a return ProviderConfigurationBuilder.create()
.property()
.name("test")
.label("Test attribute")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.MULTIVALUED_LIST_TYPE)
.helpText("Realm attibutes")
// set the current values for this specific attribute
.setOptions(realm.getAttributes().get("specific")) It would render something like this: Then you'll create some @Override
public void onCreate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
realm.setAttribute(model.getAttribute());
// save the realm
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit I like the idea to have UI configuration possibilities on the server side. This way, it's easily possible to enable or disable custom UI pages per realm (or have other configuration defined by Admins). However, why not also supporting custom elements without server-side configuration possibilities, i.e. making the server-side SPI optional? For simple extensions, implementing a SPI might be unnecessary effort. That's how I think building extensions could be further simplified. But, of course, I'm not that much into the details. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My proposal wouldn't be the only way to configure the UI, just one additional one. We still would also like an client side framework that will be even more flexible. I don't fully understand what your |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We'd want to keep client-side extensions to an absolute minimum and possibly offer an entry-point mostly on the SPI side of things. There is a lot of complexity involved doing such things on the client, whereas doing so on the Java-side we already have existing systems application and extension developers are intimately familiar with. What do you suppose would be the advantage of doing this client side? How would that look for developers of extensions and other integrations with Keycloak? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I thought of that As background information what we currently do (for the Account UI, but same is planned for Admin UI): In many cases we write completely new pages, with custom css, custom endpoints etc. Some of the pages are only relevant for a subset of our customers. However, customization and extension of the Account UI (V2) turned out quite difficult for us. Currently we have copied the Keycloak Account UI and overwritten parts of it. Merging upstream changes is quite time consuming and error-prone. What would be great for us:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
For the asset loading section, that is something that is definitely a thing that has been on my mind for a while. I am not a fan of defining the assets (e.g. scripts and styles) through the property files, at least not in it's current incarnation. For example, one of the things that bothers me is the fact that a child theme has to overwrite the It also doesn't allow any granularity in how the scripts and styles are loaded. For example, adding a This is however something we don't want to solve on the client-side. Instead I would like to see a new 'asset loader' SPI that can be used to enqueue scripts and styles, and also allow extension developers to swap or remove Keycloak built-ins. See #22042 (comment) for more information about this proposal. As for the extending the UI with navigation items, tabs, pages, etc. That is also something we want to allow using Java-based APIs, there is clearly a need for this. But we very explicitly do not want to expose our front-end stack, as that would make it hard for future upgrades to our stack. So providing custom HTML with scripts on a page would very much be an 'escape hatch', giving you full control, but we cannot guarantee that things won't break do to changes we make to the React code-base. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit this seems to be an approach to provide screens for configuration data stored as realm attributes, right? Or would it also work for custom screens which work on existing Keycloak data? Let's say if someone wants to
This would not be solved by this approach, I assume. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It doesn't use the realm attributes, but the component API. You can still do all of the things you want with this in your |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added Draft PR for the quickstart with an example for realm attributes and a todo list section: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would like to link to an alternative/additional idea for Admin Console extensions: The admin console doesn't integrate custom UIs but provides convenient navigation to add-on applications, which could be developed and operated independently. See #27738 "Extending the Keycloak Admin Console with links to add-on applications" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit I am just playing around with the SPI a bit. Great work, thanks for that. I have two questions for now and maybe you can help here:
With reference to my first question and while I think that using the components API to automatically store the configuration is great, are there any plans to make the component accesible that is referenced by the path (like the concrete identity provider config in my example)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
right, there are some downsides, but there is an issue to change how some of these things work |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello, I really like the concept of having a 'light' extension model to expose custom attributes that we now manage via REST API calls. Thank you for spending the time working on this extension. After doing quite a number of trial and error routines, I have the same question as mentioned above, is it already possible to use the current UI scope in a UiTab. Meaning, if I am managing the data for a specific client I would be able to present the current custom attribute values for the selected client; and afterwards be able to save the updated value(s) for the selected client. Right now it seems indeed that I am not able to retrieve the current values and modified values are updated for all the clients of the selected realm. The update statement I use is: public void onUpdate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel oldModel, ComponentModel newModel) {
logger.info("ThemeUiTab - onUpdate : " + newModel.get("clientId"));
var clientId = newModel.get("clientId");
var currentIndex = oldModel.get("attribute_consuming_service_index");
var newIndex = newModel.get("attribute_consuming_service_index");
if(currentIndex != null && newIndex != null && !newIndex.equals(currentIndex)) {
realm.getClientById(clientId).setAttribute("attribute_consuming_service_index", newModel.get("attribute_consuming_service_index"));
}
}My understanding of Keycloak extensibility is unfortunately too shallow to contribute, my apologies. Regards, Mrs. Wilke Jansoone |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@edewit can you provide the issue? i'd like to follow the progress |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit I was trying out this feature again on my way back from Keycloak Dev Day. The only thing that does not allow me to use it for my Home IdP extension currently is what @dasniko already mentioned above:
Is there any solution to this? Maybe I am just missing something or is it not supported? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was debugging this a bit this morning: {
"config":{...},
"providerId":"my-tab",
"providerType":"org.keycloak.services.ui.extend.UiTabProvider",
"parentId":"test-realm"}But in the case that @dasniko described above (and also in my use case), the parent may not be a realm. In Niko's case it should be the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit I finally had some time to play around with the feature. I am really liking it, because it offers a simple solution to add some customization to the admin ui. Is there any timeline when we can expect this feature to leave the Two things I can add:
To my understanding in the create you should move the persisted values to the model and implement a @Override
public void onCreate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
MultivaluedHashMap<String, String> config = new MultivaluedHashMap<>();
config.put("logo", List.of(realm.getAttribute("logo")));
model.setConfig(config);
}
@Override
public void onUpdate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model, ComponentModel newModel) {
realm.setAttribute("logo", newModel.get("logo"));
}Is this correct?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit Thanks for this. I've just started to play with it, and I like the direction it is going. I was experimenting with it to build an admin UI for the webhooks functionality in my events extension. I currently have my own entities to store the properties of the webhooks in the database. So I was able to use the
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sounds good. Some observations and feedback: This is essentially a duplicate of the generated UI that was already available by implementing a
We have other extensions that we considered the above for, and would consider something like this API for extending the UI:
Thanks for that clarification. This does not serve the use cases where config needs to be loaded by a combination of attributes, and/or there is an existing entity/model storage layer. It is unreasonable to believe that an extension author will significantly modify their extension storage layer in order to introduce a bad design/hack of duplicate configuration. I would consider this approach to be not useful. 👎 I'll take a look at the implementation and see if I can PR something that would allow optional override of the storage layer.
This video has our Organizations extension UI. The link should start at the right place. https://youtu.be/DNq51wWw3F4?si=HjUcsWjewRBw-OsL&t=678 To be clear, I'm not asking if it is possible or how to hack our extension into this existing method of extending the Admin UI. Instead, this should be indicative a complex extension that you may consider some aspects of as you are gathering requirements for this feature. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Cool to see that you have already extended the admin-ui it looks great! I think we can combine the page and the tab extension points to have this organization view. (btw the concept of organisations is going to be added to keycloak). So that you can have a section with multiple entities that then can be extended by adding tabs. That is something we could add to make more possible. So what was bad about 4? What would you suggest to make the UXD better? So that will still not enable you to have the stuff that you showed in the video with all the custom dialogs, but for that we do are planning to add a npm package that contains the "pages" of the admin ui. Then you will no longer have to fork the ui, but you can reuse the components and then add your own. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, cool, but awful. There are breaking changes every release. Keeping it working has been a constant thorn in our side. In contrast to our additions to the "old"/angular Admin, it is a massive effort to keep it current with each release. We're actually in the process of building our Admin UI outside of the "new" Keycloak console, as it has not (at least yet) really been meant to extend.
We'd need a lot more control over what and how things are rendered on the page. Sounds like the below will take care of that.
Are there any discussions or design documents regarding this feature? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's not published yet, but when it is it will work something like this: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's published now see https://www.npmjs.com/package/@keycloak/keycloak-account-ui and we are also working on a tool to create a project quickly https://asciinema.org/a/EAEYrjjqDDSd81moa3DrVeehw |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
One suggestion for the UI would be to allow placing the left nav link in either the "Manage", "Configure" or optionally an "Extension" section (in order to make it clear to the user that they are using functionality outside of core Keycloak). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Another issue that came up when testing this is that everything requires
Would be nice to figure out a way to allow such permissions, and not to require an admin user to have full permissions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
FYI added an enhancement issue here #28931 where I will track the suggested PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We tried the feature to add a tab to the user details. Our goal is allowing the selection of predefined values to be added as attributes to the selected user.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We are very open to suggestions. Before the new AdminUI we customized the old JS UI partially to our needs (via themes), but thought we should try a different approach than forking the new monolithic new React UI. Could you clarify what you mean with profile? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
sorry that's a typo I meant to say: "use user profile" it uses user attributes but you can add types see the section: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/#user-profile |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Similar problem still remains for custom UI. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I really need this to be resolved. I have some properties files for customized SMTP settings per client. It would be interesting to have this working. @edewit, can you tell if there is a solution to this for a future release? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, this is the main issue for me right now. At this example, @edewit fetches a value from the realm, but I have no idea how that is possible, since inside the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm working on a PoC using the new Java API (
Should be possible to do 3-5 by adding some methods to String getTitle(ComponentModel component); //use this for title and clickable field
String[] getDisplayOrder(List<ProviderConfigProperty> props); //use this for which fields to show, and in what order |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
These issues have been addressed in #31409 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you @edewit ! I'll check the nightly and report back if there are issues or feedback. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I tried this feature of a new section on keycloak version 24.0.3 and worked fine and created side menu option and all, but I upgraded the keycloak to version 25 and the side menu option disappeared but the provider is correctly loaded and in the list of the providers and I can access the page by URL. many thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'll have a look at this and your suggestions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You might have forgotten to add the feature flag when you start your server |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yup, it worked. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
created a PR to address your points |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
How can you prevent default save to the ComponentModel and initialize it from another source? Right now, it seems it always saves to some global component model instance (if it has the same provider id) and reads from it. Likely because it adds a single global "reused" model with that id that is shared regardless of where it is shown. Can we get some method override to prevent it from actually saving anything to the model (overriding onCreate, onUpdate does not work - they trigger after save). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've already suggested a similar thing. Read the full comment thread above #24805 (comment) for context. I did start a PR to see if it would be possible to do this just by creating something that would override component storage, however, that's a big thread to pull on, and it would take longer than I have to give at this point. However, I agree 100% with you in principle that this API could be much more valuable to extension developers if we could optionally override the storage and just use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Right, will try to address these points, might need some help from other teams to get this in though |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, it does not even need the full component model - just something that renders that UI. The implementation of get and set would be up to developers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Also noticed that the "page" view creates a new component model for each line you add, all with the same provider-id. Also, when you edit an existing value, it does not seem to update - it looks successful but you still get the old value after reload or get. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello, I'm using version 25.0.2 and adding feature declarative ui that way and apparently the feature is enabled but my page still doesn't appear. What am I missing? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit can you help me please? I'm still with this problem |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@slsilva1 It seems your port is already occupied by some process. You can check it via |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think this error occurs because start-dev is done when keycloak is still running: bash-5.1$ sh kc.sh start-dev --import-realm --features=declarative-ui --verbose
However, if a new port is defined the error persists: bash-5.1$ sh kc.sh start-dev --http-port=8281 --features=declarative-ui -v
But after running the above commands, the feature is mentioned in the config:
Thank you very much for any help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
First of all, cool idea @edewit! Just spent some time to play around. As far as I understand its currently only possible to add a new UiPage or a UiTab, to an already existing page/tab group. What I would like to do is:
Is this already somehow possible or planned in the future? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
atm this is not possible, but I think we could add that issue |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello sirs/madams, Please kindly refer to my issue report here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @MLukman I will get to that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I read the whole discussion, but I didn't find an issue for the situation itself. Basically, the CustomTab data needs to be related to the ClientId (UUID), instead of the realm context. I tried to save it directly in the ClientModel attributes, but since I don't have much experience with customizing Keycloak interfaces, I can't persist the information (and I don't even know how to do it, if anyone wants to help me with that). import org.keycloak.Config;
import org.keycloak.component.ComponentModel;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSession;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSessionFactory;
import org.keycloak.provider.ProviderConfigProperty;
import org.keycloak.provider.ProviderConfigurationBuilder;
import org.keycloak.services.ui.extend.UiTabProvider;
import org.keycloak.services.ui.extend.UiTabProviderFactory;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
public class ClientSmtpUITab implements UiTabProvider, UiTabProviderFactory<ComponentModel> {
private KeycloakSession session;
@Override
public String getId() {
return "smtp-config";
}
@Override
public String getPath() {
return "/:realm/clients/:clientId/:tab?";
}
@Override
public Map<String, String> getParams() {
Map<String, String> params = new HashMap<>();
params.put("tab", "smtp-config");
return params;
}
@Override
public String getHelpText() {
return "";
}
@Override
public List<ProviderConfigProperty> getConfigProperties() {
final ProviderConfigurationBuilder builder = ProviderConfigurationBuilder.create();
builder.property()
.name("smtpHost")
.label("SMTP Host")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpPort")
.label("SMTP Port")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpFrom")
.label("SMTP From")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpDisplayName")
.label("SMTP Display Name")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpUser")
.label("SMTP User")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpPassword")
.label("SMTP Password")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.PASSWORD)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpAuth")
.label("Enable Authentication")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.BOOLEAN_TYPE)
.defaultValue(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpSsl")
.label("Enable SSL")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.BOOLEAN_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add()
.property()
.name("smtpTls")
.label("SMTP Enable StartTLS")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.BOOLEAN_TYPE)
.required(false)
.add();
return builder.build();
}
@Override
public void init(Config.Scope scope) {
}
@Override
public void postInit(KeycloakSessionFactory keycloakSessionFactory) {
}
@Override
public void close() {
}
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The parameters in the path are send as well so you can get the clientId by doing: System.out.println("clientId = " + model.get("clientId")); |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The code I posted doesn't persist all the fields. So when it returns the information to the screen, only some are saved. I also tried to save using onCreate as shown below, but I don't know how to persist the Client's information and save it in its attributes. I also need it to return the information persisted by the Client when querying the tab. Apparently it's returning the whole realm. @Override
public void onCreate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
String clientId = model.get("clientId");
String host = model.get("smtpHost");
String port = model.get("smtpPort");
String from = model.get("smtpFrom");
String displayName = model.get("smtpDisplayName");
String user = model.get("smtpUser");
String password = model.get("smtpPassword");
boolean auth = Boolean.parseBoolean(model.get("smtpAuth"));
boolean ssl = Boolean.parseBoolean(model.get("smtpSsl"));
boolean tls = Boolean.parseBoolean(model.get("smtpTls"));
ClientModel client = realm.getClientById(clientId);
client.setAttribute("smtpHost", host);
client.setAttribute("smtpPort", port);
client.setAttribute("smtpFrom", from);
client.setAttribute("smtpDisplayName", displayName);
client.setAttribute("smtpUser", user);
client.setAttribute("smtpPassword", password);
client.setAttribute("smtpAuth", String.valueOf(auth));
client.setAttribute("smtpSsl", String.valueOf(ssl));
client.setAttribute("smtpTls", String.valueOf(tls));
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
right, maybe I can find a better way to make this connection based on the parameters |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi all, can someone help me? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have the exact same problem. My implementation follows the quickstart example: Here's my code, running on Keycloak 25.0.1: package org.keycloak.admin.ui;
import org.keycloak.Config;
import org.keycloak.component.ComponentModel;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSession;
import org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSessionFactory;
import org.keycloak.models.RealmModel;
import org.keycloak.provider.ProviderConfigProperty;
import org.keycloak.provider.ProviderConfigurationBuilder;
import org.keycloak.services.ui.extend.UiTabProvider;
import org.keycloak.services.ui.extend.UiTabProviderFactory;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
public class ThemeUiTab implements UiTabProvider, UiTabProviderFactory<ComponentModel> {
@Override
public String getId() {
return "Attributes";
}
@Override
public String getHelpText() {
return null;
}
@Override
public void init(Config.Scope config) {
}
@Override
public void postInit(KeycloakSessionFactory factory) {
}
@Override
public void close() {
}
@Override
public void onCreate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
realm.setAttribute("userauthurl", model.get("userauthurl"));
}
@Override
public void onUpdate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel oldModel, ComponentModel newModel) {
realm.setAttribute("userauthurl", newModel.get("userauthurl"));
}
@Override
public List<ProviderConfigProperty> getConfigProperties() {
final ProviderConfigurationBuilder builder = ProviderConfigurationBuilder.create();
builder.property()
.name("userauthurl")
.label("User Authorization Data URL")
.helpText("This URL is used by Keycloak to fetch user roles and add them to the token.")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.add();
return builder.build();
}
@Override
public String getPath() {
return "/:realm/realm-settings/:tab?";
}
@Override
public Map<String, String> getParams() {
Map<String, String> params = new HashMap<>();
params.put("tab", "attributes");
return params;
}
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
it seems that this is really a bug on 25.0.1. I upgraded my Keycloak to 26.0.0 and everythig works fine. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am experiencing an issue with my implementation of the ThemeUiTab class. The implementation works correctly when updating the realm attribute using the administrative interface. However, when I use the REST API to update the realm attribute, the new attribute is saved (as confirmed by checking Keycloak's database), but the input field in the administrative interface still displays the old value. I have tried reloading Keycloak, but the interface does not load the new value from the database. For reference, I implemented the example from the following repository: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Have you tried to clear the realm cache? This should not be necessary, of course, but would be interesting whether it's a caching issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I already tried clearing the realm cache manually. In the latest Keycloak versions, the "Clear Cache" buttons were removed, but the API endpoints still work. So, I tried clearing the cache using Also, I'm testing this on an instance running with start-dev. In development mode, the realm cache is stored locally and expires every hour. So, if the issue were cache-related, the field would have been updated within that 1-hour interval. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have the same issue, I don't think it's a cache problem but as mentioned before the values are fetched from the component model and there is currently no way to get them from the realm attributes. Would love to see a solution for this one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As far I understand, @edewit will work on a fix to this. Here's the issue #37170 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit Where you'd rather have feedback related to this? Here or on a Bug report? I realized, for now, two things:
No idea where it comes from. This is absolutely great. Thanks for the work on this! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@edewit I have played with it a bit more over the last couple of days, and I wonder if you could think of decoupling the factory from the provider. The thing is that the UiTabProvider and UiTabProviderFactory have a lot of methods in common, but most of them are not called in runtime. I tried adding this to the code, and splittet the Factory and the Provider: @OverRide It feels to me that the Since a lot of people think this could be an awesome way to have an UX for attributes, being able to read the session to update the UX with the current attributes would really be useful here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Part of how we could do customisation of the UI (#22255), we would like your opinion on introducing an Java API to extend the UI. This UI would be based on things that keycloak already supports, a SPI that you can implement that would force you to return a Configuration that would describe the screen:
Because it's based on the component model you be automatically able to save this information, but we'll add a handler as well so you can have custom logic when the save happens
By adding some json configuration you can choose to have this as a Tab under an existing page or as a "master > detail" page with it's own menu. See #23772 for more details, WDYT?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions