8000 Ensure the lutaml/xsd gem (which supports to_liquid) allows access to the annotations given inside the UnitsML XSD file · Issue #7 · lutaml/lutaml-xsd · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Ensure the lutaml/xsd gem (which supports to_liquid) allows access to the annotations given inside the UnitsML XSD file #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ou 8000 r terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Tracked by #441
, #176 ,  #5
...
ronaldtse opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
Tracked by #441
, #176 ,  #5
...

Ensure the lutaml/xsd gem (which supports to_liquid) allows access to the annotations given inside the UnitsML XSD file #7

ronaldtse opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
@suleman-uzair
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

From:

The UnitsML 1.0 XSD schema is at:

The XSD file contains annotations that is now generated into documentation published here ("official documentation"):

The task here is to ensure this gem exposes all "necessary content" given in the XSD file:

  • necessary content = what is seen at the "official documentation" now
@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 21, 2025
This was referenced Jan 21, 2025
Open
Open
Open
@suleman-uzair
Copy link
Member

@ronaldtse, I have been able to verify the parsing and conversion of unitsml/schemas/unitsml-v1.0-csd03.xsd and unitsml/schemas/unitsml-v1.0-csd04.xsd in PR #8.
Now, looking at this issue, do we only need all annotation content or do we need any other information related or not related to annotations?
For example, this Element: CodeListValue, contains the name, type, and used by, along with its annotation.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe we need all of those. Could you check the current rendered documentation to see what else we need?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@suleman-uzair suleman-uzair

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ronaldtse @suleman-uzair
0