8000
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recently a bug in pyorbital's sun-earth distance correction was fixed: pytroll/pyorbital#97.
Pygac does not use pyorbital for this, but makes the same mistake:
pygac/pygac/utils.py
Line 89 in 05ba35e
I propose to use pyorbital for this.
@ninahakansson @abhaydd @kgkarl This would change the output (to the better).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It makes total sense to remove code duplication, I'm in favour.
To make sure the bug doesn't reappear, maybe a test case for reflectance computation could be added at the same time?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.< 9CAB /p>
Sorry, false alarm. As pointed out by @abhaydd the factor is applied only once, so there's no problem.
pygac/pygac/calibration.py
Line 340 in 05ba35e
I'm opening a new issue regarding code duplication.
@sfinkens, I still think it makes sense to remove code duplication and use pyorbital here.
sfinkens
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Recently a bug in pyorbital's sun-earth distance correction was fixed: pytroll/pyorbital#97.
Pygac does not use pyorbital for this, but makes the same mistake:
pygac/pygac/utils.py
Line 89 in 05ba35e
I propose to use pyorbital for this.
@ninahakansson @abhaydd @kgkarl This would change the output (to the better).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: