8000 Some error on the treatments clasiification and missing genus authorships - E20C3571FFFCFFD0FF845366E9192960 · Issue #411 · plazi/community · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Some error on the treatments clasiification and missing genus authorships - E20C3571FFFCFFD0FF845366E9192960 #411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
camiplata opened this issue May 14, 2025 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment

Comments

@camiplata
Copy link
camiplata commented May 14, 2025

The classification of some treatments of this paper is partially incorrect

For example this treatment looks like:

Image

Correct classification according to the paper:

  Family Aturidae  `ignored on the treatment`
  Subfamily Axonopsinae K. Viets, 1929 `interpreted as a family although on the paper is a subfamily`
  Genus Brachypoda Lebert, 1879 `The complete authorship name + year is missing`
  Brachypoda (Hemibrachypoda) mutila (Walter, 1928)  

The combination of issues on the classification an missing authorship+year makes this name harder to merge the names of this dataset on the extended release of Catalogue of life due to homonyms.

There al also several subgenus explicitly stated on the paper that are being treated:

Image
@flsimoes flsimoes added the fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment label May 14, 2025
@JonasBlanco
Copy link

Hi, Camila!

I fixed the classifications. Soon it should update in the repositories.
Regarding the subgenera in the paper, they are not treated but only cited (as higher classification for the species treated).

@camiplata
Copy link
Author

Thanks Jonas, I see that the classification is better now.
Is it possible to also fix the authorship+ year of the genera? as I mention before, the lack of this information makes harder to merge the names of this dataset on the extended release of Catalogue of life due to homonyms.

@JonasBlanco JonasBlanco reopened this May 15, 2025
@JonasBlanco
Copy link

Hi!
I fixed all the autorships I found that could have some issues.

@camiplata
Copy link
Author

Hi Jonas,

The authorship+year of the genera are not showing up yet

Image

they should. ber for example:

Aturus Kramer, 1875
Kongsbergia Thor, 1899
Albaxona Szalay, 1944

Looking at the plazi page I think is because genus are also not being treated. Is it possible to add them even in the classification even if they are not being treated?

@JonasBlanco
Copy link

Yes, that was the case, the genera are not treated inside the paper.
8437 I tried a trick, let's see if it works.

@camiplata
Copy link
Author

it worked!! Thank you, many of these names go for the XR, is great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
0