8000 rake resque:pool isn't respecting TERM_CHILD? · Issue #150 · resque/resque-pool · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
8000
Skip to content
rake resque:pool isn't respecting TERM_CHILD? #150
Open
< 7B40 !--/$-->
@adambedford

Description

@adambedford

I think I'm seeing an issue where rake resque:pool doesn't honor the TERM_CHILD=1 flag. If I run resque-pool, it does work as expected.

Here is the output from rake resque:pool:

~/app $ TERM_CHILD=1 bundle exec rake resque:pool
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34943]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34943:*
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34944]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34944:*
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34935]: started manager
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34945]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34945:*
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34935]: Pool contains worker PIDs: [34943, 34944, 34945, 34946, 34947]
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34946]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34946:*
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34947]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34947:*
^Cresque-pool-manager[integrations][34935]: INT: immediate shutdown (graceful worker shutdown)
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34935]: Sending TERM to all workers
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34935]: manager finished

Here is the output from resque-pool:

~/app $ TERM_CHILD=1 bundle exec resque-pool
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: Resque Pool running in development environment
resque-pool-manager[34858]: TERM_CHILD enabled, so will user 'term-graceful-and-wait' behaviour
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34866]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34866:*
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34867]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34867:*
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34868]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34868:*
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: started manager
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: Pool contains worker PIDs: [34866, 34867, 34868, 34869, 34870]
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34870]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34870:*
resque-pool-worker[integrations][34869]: Starting worker abedford-mbpr.local:34869:*
^Cresque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: INT: immediate shutdown (graceful worker shutdown)
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: Sending TERM to all workers
resque-pool-manager[integrations][34858]: manager finished

I notice this line: resque-pool-manager[34858]: TERM_CHILD enabled, so will user 'term-graceful-and-wait' behaviour indicating that term child is enabled. Does the lack of this in the rake resque:pool mean what I think it does - that TERM_CHILD isn't respected?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      0