You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The specFull and specLite datamodels are incorrect in many places. It looks like for most of the older DRs, the template and location fields are populated incorrectly, sometimes using a real location rather than an abstract one. The HDU extension names are missing sometimes, e.g. in DR16. Many, if not all, of the specLite releases have extras hdu fields, e.g. R1-00104931-00104934-00104935. I'm not sure if these are extensions in the specFull file that were accidentally copied into the Lite datamodel, or if these are new extensions for SDSS-V in the WORK release or DR18 that got accidentally back-propagated. In any case, I think both these datamodels should be regenerated from scratch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
specFull
andspecLite
datamodels are incorrect in many places. It looks like for most of the older DRs, thetemplate
andlocation
fields are populated incorrectly, sometimes using a real location rather than an abstract one. The HDU extension names are missing sometimes, e.g. in DR16. Many, if not all, of thespecLite
releases have extrashdu
fields, e.g.R1-00104931-00104934-00104935
. I'm not sure if these are extensions in thespecFull
file that were accidentally copied into the Lite datamodel, or if these are new extensions for SDSS-V in the WORK release or DR18 that got accidentally back-propagated. In any case, I think both these datamodels should be regenerated from scratch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: